Stuff we linked to on Twitter last week

A post by Chris RowanA post by Anne Jefferson

Earthquakes

The big news this week was the magnitude 7.2 earthquake in eastern Turkey, which I blogged about here and expanded on in a post on the Scientific American Guest Blog. Some other useful links and resources:

Volcanoes

Fossils

Planets

(Paleo)climate

Water (floods)

Environmental

General Geology

Interesting Miscellaney

Categories: links

Scenic Halloween Saturday

A post by Chris RowanAs the leaves turn and colder nights draw in, let us journey to a mysterious country that holds an even more mysterious glowing orange pit. Halloween is upon us, so could we be looking on a newly-opened gateway to the demonic realms? Well no, but I doubt that I need to tell you that.

An spooky orange glow lights an.... orange landscape?!

Your more prosaic geological instincts might point out a superficial resemblence to some kind of volcanic vent, and they’d be right – especially about the superficial part. Behold the volcanic pumpkin!

An erupting pumpkin.

You can too get bifurcating lava flows.

I was also running an experiment in how much pumpkin you could carve away before it collapsed.

Yes, this is my attempt to give our doorstep this weekend a somewhat geological flavour. I must confess that I find it rather puzzling that a country that wrings its hands over the demonic influences in Harry Potter* throws itself so enthusiastically into this stuff – I’ve been walking past gardens decorated with pumpkins, skeletons, and gravestones for at least the past week. But I have been getting into the spirit of the thing by trying my unpracticed hand at pumpkin carving, and the caldera-like glow emanating from the top of my first effort, pictured below, gave me the idea.

A more standard effort.

I was considering something considerably more nerdy for the Accretionary Wedge geo-pumpkin challenge, but the magma pumpkin generates a faint air of menance that is possibly more in the spirit of the season.

*which, if you ask me, not so much misses the point as misses the solar system.

Categories: bloggery, photos, volcanoes

M 7.2 earthquake near Van, eastern Turkey

A post by Chris RowanEarlier this morning, a magnitude 7.2 earthquake hit near the city of Van on the eastern border of Turkey. The BBC reports that at least 45 people have died as buildings collapsed close to the rupture.

The most well-known seismic hazard in Turkey is probably the North Anatolian Fault, a major strike-slip fault which runs along the south of the Black Sea and underneath Istanbul, and ruptured in an extremely damaging earthquake in 1999. Today’s earthquake is much too far east to be on this stucture, and the focal mechanism shows that it was due to compressional thrust faulting, not strike slip motion.

Focal mechanism for 23rd October earthquake near Van, eastern Turkey, and its wider tectonic context. Click to enlarge.

Eastern Turkey is sandwiched in a continental collision zone, caused by the Arabian plate to the south moving northwards into the Eurasian plate to the north; this is part of a belt of mountain-building that runs all the way from the Alps to the Himalayas. This earthquake appears to have occurred near the junction of two mountain belts, the Zagros and the Alborz ranges, that have been produced by this collision. Like toffee squeezed in a vise, the pressure of Arabia and Eurasia being squashed together in the east forces the crust in between – the Antatolian plate – sideways into an area where the pressure is lower. This lateral eastward motion is largely accommodated by strike slip along the North Anatolian and East Anatolian Faults, and eventually by subduction in the eastern Mediterranean. So in the grand tectonic scheme of things, today’s earthquake can be linked to the more well-known tectonic activity further to the west: they both occur in response to the same driving forces. Convergence in eastern Turkey primes the pump for future westward motion of the Anatolian plate, which will be accommodated by earthquakes on the Anatolian Faults. Note that this is thinking over million year timescales – in the short term, the hazard on the faults further west (which is already high) will not be affected by this one earthquake.

The reported depth of the earthquake is 16-20 km, which seems to have been deep enough to restrict the most intense shaking to a relatively small area around the epicentre.

Shake Map for the earthquake. Source: USGS

Unfortunately, the city of Van, which has a population of 367,000, lies within this area. Turkey’s building codes do include provisions for earthquake-proofing, but despite more vigorous efforts to enforce compliance in recent years, many older buildings are probably very vulnerable, especially in the poorer eastern parts of the country. This photo from the earthquake zone, via the BBC, which appears to show a collapsed multiple-story building, is unlikely to be an isolated example.

Collapsed 3(?)-storey building in Van. Source: BBC.

Categories: earthquakes, focal mechanisms, geohazards, tectonics

Scenic Saturday: Minnesota, Land of Lakes

A post by Anne JeffersonIn Minnesota, two Saturdays ago, the weather was ridiculously warm, but the trees knew it was autumn and were well into their fall foliage fireworks. It was the perfect afternoon to enjoy a walk around one of Minnesota’s most famous natural features. The name of the state derives from the Dakota word minisota for “water that reflects the sky.” Minnesota is also known as “the land of 10,000 lakes,” though the state’s Department of Natural Resources gives the tally as 11,842 lakes greater than 10 acres (4.04 ha) in size.

Staring Lake, October 2011

Staring Lake, October 2011, photo by A. Jefferson


The lake whose circumference I chose to ramble was Staring Lake in Eden Prairie, a southwestern suburb of Minneapolis. I lived near the lake when I was doing my M.S. degree at the University of Minnesota, but it had been nearly 10 years since last I had walked around the 155 acre (62.7 ha) lake. The trail was as pretty as I remembered, and soon I encountered the spot where Purgatory Creek flows into the lake, draining 42 square kilometers of suburban and urban landscapes.

Purgatory Creek flowing into Staring Lake

Purgatory Creek flowing into Staring Lake, October 2011, photo by A. Jefferson

Staring Lake is a flow-through lake, and a little farther along the trail, Purgatory Creek exits the lake, heading for the Minnesota River. The day I walked the trail, the lake was low, and the streambed for lower Purgatory Creek was mostly dry, with just stagnant pools of water accentuating its meandering channel pattern. I’ve seen both sides of Purgatory Creek flowing much more vigorously, as a Minnesota winter’s worth of snow rapidly melted off the land.

Purgatory Creek, out of Staring Lake

Purgatory Creek, (not really) flowing out of Staring Lake, October 2011, photo by A. Jefferson

A bluff rises 26 m high, from the south shore of the lake, though the lake itself has a maximum depth of 5 m, and an average depth of 2 m. The lake’s location and topography are the result of Minnesota’s glacial and post-glacial history.

Surficial geology of Staring Lake and surrounding areas

Surficial geology of Staring Lake and surrounding areas, excerpted from Plate 3 of the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, 1989. The Minnesota river forms the southern boundary of the map area. The gray (do) south of the lake is outwash, the greens are till (dt = loamy till, dtc = clayey till, dts = sandy till), purple is lacustrine deposits (ld), blue is organic deposits (do) (i.e., wetlands), t2 is a Minnesota River terrace, c is colluvium and small alluvial fans, and fc is clayey floodplain alluvium.

The Late Wisconsin glaciation is described in the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas as the dominant force shaping the landscape around Staring Lake. According to the Geologic Atlas, “Hennepin County was completely covered by ice sheets of both domains [the Superior Lobe and the Des Moines Lobe] during the last glaciation. … Although the Superior Lobe once reached across Hennepin County and into Carver County, it apparently did not remain at its maximum very long, but retreated to a more stable position where it constructed the hills of the St. Croix moraine.” The St. Croix moraine lies just a bit to the north of Staring Lake, in those green till map units.

“While stagnant blocks of Superior lobe ice were melting, glacial ice from the Keewatin center moved into Hennepin County. This ice sheet, named the Des Moines lobe, … After the ice sheet retreated to downtown Minneapolis and west of the Calhoun chain of lakes, its meltwater laid down a broad outwash plain (unit do) fed by several large streams moving across and within the stagnating ice and draining through the St. Croix Moraine. … The Eden Prairie outwash plain also was laid down at this time, but over silty sediment from an earlier lake trapped between the moraine and retreating ice. A minor readvance of the Des Moines lobe laid a thin layer of till over the western part of the Eden Prairie outwash.The pitted character of parts of both outwash plains reflects continued melting of ice after deposition ceased and collapse of outwash already in place. Small ice-walled lakes (unit dlc) formed on drainage divides where no outlets were available to the major meltwater streams. (Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, 1989).”

Based on this, as best I can tell, Staring Lake is probably one of the small ice-walled lakes described in the above text, though Purgatory Creek has, during the Holocene, created both an inlet and outlet for the lake. The geologic atlas goes on to say: “Most of the lakes and bogs in Hennepin County are in depressions created by eventual melting of buried remnants of the two last ice advances.” The atlas concludes, “Lakes and bogs are filling in with sediment and organic debris (units ld and o). Human activity in places has speeded up the process (unit od).”

The Minnesota River Valley is probably the most prominent topographic feature of the Minneapolis region, and that’s got its own glacial and post-glacial story to tell. But that will have to wait for another day. For it’s a scenic Saturday afternoon here in North Carolina, and there are pumpkins waiting to be picked.

Categories: by Anne, geomorphology, photos, Pleistocene

Friday Focal Mechanisms: the Hayward Fault shows up to the Shakeout Party

A post by Chris RowanYesterday, several million Californians participated in the 2011 Great California ShakeOut – a simulated earthquake drill, held close to the anniversary of the 1989 Loma Preita earthquake, that aims not only to raise awareness of the ever-present risk of a large earthquake occurring in California, but also to make sure that when it does happen, people know what to do.

The drill occurred at 10:20 am yesterday morning, but for the residents of San Francisco, the Earth itself also decided to provide a pointed reminder that they lived in a seismically active area. About four hours later the Bay area was shaken by a shallow magnitude 4.0 tremor centred near Berkeley, and a magnitude 3.8 just a little to the north a few hours after that. They were located pretty much on top of the trace of the Hayward Fault, and this structure’s culpability is confirmed by the strike-slip focal mechanisms of both of these earthquakes. The Hayward Fault runs parallel to the main San Andreas Fault, and like its neighbour helps to accommodate the northwest motion of the Pacific plate relative to the North American plate. As you can see, both focal mechanisms can be explained by motion along a southeast-northwest oriented fault plate, with the western side moving northwest.

Focal mechanisms for the two moderate quakes beneath Berkeley on ShakeOut Day. Map source: USGS.

As far as I’m aware, activity of this magnitude is not unusual in this region. You get earthquakes of this size in Northern California every month or so; in a quick search of the regional earthquake catalogue I found about a dozen (Update: see Eric Fielding’s comment below for more locally specific information) . However, none of the others happened to coincide with a major earthquake drill, which probably makes these two feel more significant to our pattern-junkie brains. Just for once, this effect could be considered beneficial, providing a useful reinforcement of the ShakeOut message of ‘Drop, Cover, Hold On!

Categories: earthquakes, focal mechanisms, geohazards