It’s menial, but it’s progress

I think it’s safe to say that my week is never going to feature prominently in the annals of geological science. I’ve spent most of it standing in front of a rock saw, cutting up the cores that I collected from the White Mfolozi River, and getting very muddy in the process. When I haven’t been doing that, I’ve been labelling the resultant samples, and checking that the all-important orientation marks are still clear. Suffice to say, my brain has not been especially taxed by this activity, and the only discovery I have made is the stunningly obvious one that ultra-hard Archean metabasalts are much easier to chop up than friable and fractured Neogene mudstones. Not that this is a bad thing: not having to try and piece together every other sample from the tiny fragments it has exploded into on contact with the saw blade is a pleasant change from my previous experiences in the rock-cutting room.
However, whilst this may not be the most exciting thing that I’m ever going to do, it’s still important; it’s one more step on the long road to actually – hopefully- getting some decent paleomagnetic data to play with. In my lab there are now a whole array of samples laid out, ready to be measured, zapped and/or heated, remeasured, rezapped and/or reheated, remeasured… and after all that, I’ll be able to have my first look at whether these rocks do indeed record a 3 billion year-old magnetic signal, and start thinking about what it tells us. That’s the thing about experimental science; you have to put in a lot of grunt work before the ultimate pay-off.
There is another plus, too: it may be menial, but when you’ve spent a day cutting and running samples, you’re rewarded with the feeling of making tangible progress, which you sometimes miss when you’re endlessly rewriting the same paragraphs for a paper, or fiddling about with the best plot for your data. I set out to do something, and it’s done. No rewrites, no second thoughts, no hazy feelings that it could/should be better. Saying, ‘I prepared 100 samples today’ probably isn’t going to impress anyone else, but it feels good all the same.

Categories: academic life

Lusi: not man-made after all?

The latest from Lusi
Regular readers of this blog should be aware of the mud volcano currently erupting in the Sidoarjo district in East Java, Indonesia, and the unsuccessful attempts to stem the flow by dropping concrete balls into the vent. Meanwhile, more and more villages, railways and factories are being engulfed, and tens of thousands of people displaced, by the encroaching mud. Just compare the image on the right below, taken at the beginning of June, to the one on the left, taken last September (source):

lusisatcomp.jpg

Continue reading

Categories: earthquakes, geohazards, geology, Lusi, paper reviews

Precambrian black smokers

I’ve been reading a few news items today about fossilized black smoker chimneys from China. This rang a few bells, as I wrote about a paper which talked about exactly the same thing on ye olde blog back in January. As it turns out, it’s the same paper, by Jianghai Li and Tim Kusky , which has only just been officially published – it came to my attention via a Sciencedirect e-mail alert when it was in press (accepted but still waiting for formatting and a slot in the next available journal issue). Was that a faux-pas I wonder?
Anyway, as it appears to be topical, I thought I’d repost my thoughts. I have to say that I’m a little suspicious of the ‘key evidence of life’s beginnings’ spin being applied to these findings – the first evidence of life in the geological record comes in beyond the 3.5 billion year mark, meaning that there is more distance between the first replicating organisms and these black smoker microbes as there is between the black smoker microbes and us. As I say below, this discovery could be considered suggestive, but drawing too many sweeping conclusions would be a tad hasty.
From ye olde blog:
These are pretty cool – some excellently preserved black smoker chimneys from a 1.43 billion year-old massive sulphide body in northern China:

vent1.jpg

Continue reading

Categories: fossils, geology

My drowning homeland

I’m a long way from the current flooding chaos back in the UK which, along with the episode earlier this summer, has forced millions of people to face the shocking revelation that flood plains occasionally, erm, get flooded. Fortunately, my family live in a different part of the country, and friends who do live in the affected areas fortuitously live on hills (in fact, one rather sensibly checked the Environment Agency’s flood maps before she bought her house). I, of course, am currently living at an altitude of 1800m in one of the few major cities in the world not built on a major river; most residents here need to worry far more about acts of their fellow men than Acts of God.
The European Space Agency has released some satellite imagery of the flooding, including this image of the overflowing River Thames (on the right), compared to a normal view.

floodedThames.jpg

Continue reading

Categories: climate science, environment, public science

Nuclear ‘green’, renewables not?

I’m not sure what to make of this:

Renewable does not mean green. That is the claim of Jesse Ausubel of the Rockefeller University in New York. Writing in Inderscience’s International Journal of Nuclear Governance, Economy and Ecology, Ausubel explains that building enough wind farms, damming enough rivers, and growing enough biomass to meet global energy demands will wreck the environment.

Ausubel has analyzed the amount of energy that each so-called renewable source can produce in terms of Watts of power output per square meter of land disturbed. He also compares the destruction of nature by renewables with the demand for space of nuclear power. “Nuclear energy is green,” he claims, “Considered in Watts per square meter, nuclear has astronomical advantages over its competitors.”

Continue reading

Categories: environment