Leopard vs Crocodile

Remember the sign I saw on one of my sampling trips earlier this year?

Warning.jpg

It was certainly brought to my mind by last week’s story about marauding Russian bears. Encountering a leopard or a crocodile would be pretty scary; however, if these amazing photos are anything to go by, then encountering a leopard and a crocodile would at least give me the spectacle of a fight over who got to eat me.

crocleopard.jpg

There’s also a video here, mirrored on YouTube (which I’d embed, except the University server here blocks YouTube).

Categories: bloggery

2700 million years in one outcrop

This was the first outcrop we stopped at on our last field trip:

BFU-1.jpg

Continue reading

Categories: deep time, fieldwork, geology

Crackers and me

I preface these comments with the following two disclaimers:
(1) PZ Myers has the right to write what he likes on his blog, and he certainly has the right to dispose of items in his possession, be they (supposedly) edible or not, in any manner he chooses.
(2) Any Catholic planning to wax lyrical on how their faith is one of ‘tolerence and peace’ should, in the light of recent events, check that everyone in the vicinity has switched off their irony meters, lest they cause their neighbourhood to transubstantiate into a large, smoking crater.
Nonetheless, on reviewing the whole palava kicked off by the original ‘cracker’ post, I can’t help but wish that he’d wrapped it up one paragraph early. One of the forces behind the rise of the so-called ‘New Atheism’ is the increasingly brazen attempts by some religious denominations to push their beliefs into government, and into other people’s lives, on the basis of their faith alone. Inserting dogma into the public discourse justifiably opens it up to critical examination and possible ridicule (even if those doing the inserting apparently feel that their ‘deeply held beliefs’ negate the need to actually present – and win – a reasoned argument), and in this case the Catholic church, by using (or abusing) nominally secular University authorities to pursue the original Eucharist thief, had clearly crossed that line, and deserved to be called on it. But the whole ‘send me your crackers’ thing – well, I winced, because suddenly the whole thing started to feel more like a case of going after peoples’ beliefs within their own house of worship, and if it felt like that to me, I could imagine how it would be viewed by those well used to crying “help, help, I’m being oppressed!” at even the smallest provocation. In the end, the simultaneous disposal of the God Delusion was a worthy attempt to swing the focus back onto the core message of ‘nothing is sacred’, but I’m not sure it really succeeded; in such polarised debates, the message you’re trying to send, and the message that is actually received, can be very different beasts.
I doubt PZ cares much about my squemishness – and he shouldn’t. However, given that we do occupy the same blog network, and that a disturbingly high number of people seem to mistakenly believe (even in the face of the periodic flame-wars) that when one of us speaks, they speak for us all, I just wanted to make it known that unless the Catholic church is planning to force-feed me those wafers any time soon, I fail to see either the wisdom or the effectiveness of PZ’s tilting at Eucharistic windmills.
This is a personal opinion of the author. Anyone treating or using it as a condemnation is being an idiot, and will be dealt with as such.

Categories: bloggery, ranting

Geopuzzle #13

Whilst I struggle to cope with the suddent onset of dementia in my beloved but aging laptop (which causes it to switch off 5 seconds after I switch it on, before it even gets to the stage of booting up), here’s a simple one for you. How big is this piece of muscovite?

P7250241.jpg

Update: Click through for the answer.
Be as precise as you dare…

Categories: geopuzzling

Volcanoes: our noble allies in the battle against export productivity

Finally, a blogospheric spat that actually matters. Craig McClain over at Deep Sea News has accused volcanoes of being the implacable enemies of marine life, based on new research linking them to some bouts of extreme ocean anoxia (where the deep oceans become severely depleted in oxygen, to the detriment of much of the life there). Maria jumped to rebut what she views as a vile libel (unsurprisingly, the Volcanism Blog has backed her up), and Craig has now hit back, rebutting her rebuttal.
It’s certainly true that volcanoes can be bad for life, both marine and non. A large-ish volcanic eruption such as the Mount Pinatubo eruption in 1991 has global effects on the atmosphere and climate, and that’s just a small pop compared to those times in the geological past where whole tracts of the Earth’s surface have been resurfaced by flood basalts (over a million square kilometres in the case of the Siberian Traps, which are widely – but not universally – implicated in the end-Permian extinction 250 million years ago).
But what Craig isn’t telling you is that the marine biosphere has it’s own dirty little secret. What do marine organisms do? They take carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, either directly by photosynthesis, or more indirectly by taking bicarbonate from ocean water to make protective shells. Then they die, and sink to the ocean bottom, where all that organically fixed carbon is incorporated into carbonate- or organic rich sediments. Once buried, it’s pretty hard to remobilise it, and its especially hard to get it back into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide.*
Over geological time, this continual drawdown would leave us with an atmosphere devoid of all CO2, which would severely cool the planet by reducing the greenhouse effect (note: this fact has no bearing on the potentially deleterious effects of anthropogenic global warming. You can have too much of a good thing, and you can certainly have it too fast). In effect, marine export productivity (as it is called) has the potential to freeze all life on the planet to death.
Fortunately, plate tectonics comes to the rescue. When oceanic crust is subducted back into the mantle, the carbon-bearing sediments are heated, degassed, and the CO2 is incorporated into the ascending magma beneath…. volcanic arcs.
So perhaps we shouldn’t be renaming the Ring of Fire the ‘Arc of Evil’ after all. More seriously, life may sometimes be threatened by geology, but it is also intimately shaped by it, and I’m firmly convinced that life, and especially complex life, is dependent on vigorous geological activity to provide – and more importantly, maintain – the thermochemical gradients that drive interesting chemistry. Volcanoes may cause the odd extinction event or two, but they’re also a big part of why there are things to go extinct in the first place.
*This fact is the basis for all of the ideas about stimulating algal blooms in the ocean by seeding them with limiting micronutrients such as iron, to absorb anthropogenic CO2 (see the third item here)..

Categories: climate science, environment, geology, tectonics, volcanoes