Volcanoes: our noble allies in the battle against export productivity

Finally, a blogospheric spat that actually matters. Craig McClain over at Deep Sea News has accused volcanoes of being the implacable enemies of marine life, based on new research linking them to some bouts of extreme ocean anoxia (where the deep oceans become severely depleted in oxygen, to the detriment of much of the life there). Maria jumped to rebut what she views as a vile libel (unsurprisingly, the Volcanism Blog has backed her up), and Craig has now hit back, rebutting her rebuttal.
It’s certainly true that volcanoes can be bad for life, both marine and non. A large-ish volcanic eruption such as the Mount Pinatubo eruption in 1991 has global effects on the atmosphere and climate, and that’s just a small pop compared to those times in the geological past where whole tracts of the Earth’s surface have been resurfaced by flood basalts (over a million square kilometres in the case of the Siberian Traps, which are widely – but not universally – implicated in the end-Permian extinction 250 million years ago).
But what Craig isn’t telling you is that the marine biosphere has it’s own dirty little secret. What do marine organisms do? They take carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, either directly by photosynthesis, or more indirectly by taking bicarbonate from ocean water to make protective shells. Then they die, and sink to the ocean bottom, where all that organically fixed carbon is incorporated into carbonate- or organic rich sediments. Once buried, it’s pretty hard to remobilise it, and its especially hard to get it back into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide.*
Over geological time, this continual drawdown would leave us with an atmosphere devoid of all CO2, which would severely cool the planet by reducing the greenhouse effect (note: this fact has no bearing on the potentially deleterious effects of anthropogenic global warming. You can have too much of a good thing, and you can certainly have it too fast). In effect, marine export productivity (as it is called) has the potential to freeze all life on the planet to death.
Fortunately, plate tectonics comes to the rescue. When oceanic crust is subducted back into the mantle, the carbon-bearing sediments are heated, degassed, and the CO2 is incorporated into the ascending magma beneath…. volcanic arcs.
So perhaps we shouldn’t be renaming the Ring of Fire the ‘Arc of Evil’ after all. More seriously, life may sometimes be threatened by geology, but it is also intimately shaped by it, and I’m firmly convinced that life, and especially complex life, is dependent on vigorous geological activity to provide – and more importantly, maintain – the thermochemical gradients that drive interesting chemistry. Volcanoes may cause the odd extinction event or two, but they’re also a big part of why there are things to go extinct in the first place.
*This fact is the basis for all of the ideas about stimulating algal blooms in the ocean by seeding them with limiting micronutrients such as iron, to absorb anthropogenic CO2 (see the third item here)..

Categories: climate science, environment, geology, tectonics, volcanoes

When bears attack

We’ve discussed before how geologists’ pursuit of the critical outcrop sometimes puts us in somewhat sticky situations, but in this story, rather scarily, its not so much a case of geologists ambling into danger as danger ambling towards them.

At least 30 hungry bears have trapped a group of geologists at their remote survey site in Russia’s far east after killing two of their co-workers last week, emergency officials said on Tuesday…

…Rampant fish poaching in the empty tundra of Russia’s farthest reaches sends hungry bear populations into populated centres every year, attracted to the food-rich garbage humans leave behind.

Officials said a helicopter ferrying officials and hunters could not fly in bad weather, but an all-terrain vehicle was on its way to the camp, where it would await government approval to shoot the bears.

I have a colleague who has done fieldwork in northern Canada and had his fair share of bear encounters whilst he was there, but his stories mainly involve just the one individual, which is apparently frightening enough. You can steer clear of or possibly intimidate one, but 30? It sounds like the plot of some cheap 50s horror movie. Hopefully these guys can get out without further casualties.

Categories: fieldwork, geohazards

Back

So, I’m back in Johannesburg, after a very interesting trip which took us all the way from Archean congolomerates in the stable continental interior to diamond-bearing Tertiary alluvial gravels on the West Coast. Plenty of stuff to talk about, then – I’m just still suffering from the usual post-field slump, where I sit at my desk, feeling a little bit frazzled from all the travelling, and try to remember how my computer works. As my brain spins up into a more productive state, here’s proof that I didn’t just take photographs of interesting outcrops.

SAWestCoastSunset.jpg

FlowerPegmatite.jpg

That’s right: sometimes I take pictures of interesting rocks framed by nice sunsets or pretty little flowers!

Categories: bloggery, fieldwork

Electronic field notebooks: useful, or pain in the posterior?

The UJ mapping class this year were piloting electronic field notebooks, with each group being given a PDA in which they could enter a locality, a description, and any structural data they were measuring. Especially with the structual data, this may seem like a useful innovation which saves hours of tedious data entry when you’re back home. Still, I remain to be convinced that using an electronic notebook is automatically a good thing; the batteries don’t run out when you’re using pen and paper, and there’s also the fact that fieldwork is not kind to delicate electronics (for example, whilst I’m sampling for palaeomag, there’s a lot of mud flying about, including all over me, and I doubt this interacts too well with computery stuff)
I’d be interested to know if anyone else has experiences in using such devices in the field, either in an educational or research context, and what your thoughts are on their usefulness (or lack thereof). Does the extra functionality make it any more useful than a basic (and more rugged) GPS?

Categories: field gear, fieldwork, gifts and gadgets

Are jeans sensible fieldwear?

One thing I noticed amongst the students on last week’s trip was that a fairly sizeable proportion of them were regularly wearing jeans in the field.

jeans1b.jpg

jeans2b.jpg

You are unlikely to see British third year geology students opting for denim in such large numbers, because it is likely that one of the things they learn on their first year excursion, which commonly takes them somewhere in Scotland, is that wet denim is extremely good at both weighing your legs down and sucking every erg of heat from your body. The friendlier climate at these latitudes may mean that the offenders in the above photo have not had to endure this lesson, but surely they would have experienced the clammy stickiness caused by wearing jeans when the temperature is high, especially when scrambling up and down hills in the heat of the day. Perhaps I’m alone in my opinion that jeans are, in general, highly impractical field wear*, so I open it to the floor. Should any self-respecting geologist be wearing jeans in the field?
*For the record, I usually wear shorts. But then, years of playing rugby in the depths of winter mean that my legs scarcely feel the cold.

Categories: field gear, fieldwork