The Hydrology and Evolution of Basaltic Landscapes: Notes from GSA Sunday

A post by Anne JeffersonHood_River.JPG
Like many North American geobloggers, I’ve recently returned from the Geological Society of America meeting in Portland, Oregon. It was a bittersweet trip for me, as it was a return to my spiritual homeland, where I spent five happy years working on the rocks and waters of the Cascade Range. Since then, I’ve felt a bit exiled on the Eastern Seaboard, so it was perhaps apropos that the trip back was a bit of a tease…in my four days in Oregon, I did not manage to see a single mountain. The picture to the right is the Hood River, draining the north side of Mt. Hood, about 45 minutes east of Portland. It was taken in April 2007, during field work for my post-doc.
Sunday
After an unexpectedly long layover in Phoenix and an entirely unexpected layover in San Francisco (thank you, US Airways), I arrived in Portland at 1 am local time Sunday morning. With any potential time-change/jet-lag problems thus mitigated, I arrived bright eyed for the first talks on Sunday morning.
The main order of business on Sunday morning was the Pardee Keynote Symposium on “The Evolution of Basaltic Landscapes: Time and River and the Lava Flowing.” I arrived in time to hear a fascinating talk on “Impacts of basaltic volcanism on incised fluvial systems: does the river give a dam?” by blogger/tweep/mapper extraordinaire Kyle House. He was talking about the lava dams, debris flows, and river incision of the Owyhee River of eastern Oregon. After a few gorgeous photos accompanied magnificent Lidar images, I was thoroughly convinced of the utility of Lidar for high-resolution geological mapping. I was also salivating at the thought of a whole day of water + lava talks full of gorgeous volcano photos.
After Steve Ingebritsen gave a lovely overview of the hydrogeology of basalts, Dennis Geist convinced me that I absolutely have to go to the Galapagos Islands, by showing pictures of volcanoes with whales for scale. His talk focused on the connections between geology and biology in the Galapagos, and got me thinking about the implications of volcanic emergence and subsidence for the evolution of the creatures of the famous archipelago. While Geist tried to convince his audience that the vegetation of the Galapagos is supported with basically no soil, neither I nor the next speaker, Oliver Chadwick, quite believed him on that point.
Indeed Chadwick talked about the patterns and processes of soil development on basaltic landscapes, where weathering rates depend not only on the usual climatic factors but also on the flow texture – with aa and pahoehoe flows exhibitting different patterns and timescales of soil development. For my own work, one key point that Chadwick made was “At some point in the history of lava flows, the surface becomes less permeable than the whole…” I think that statement has implications for the way we think about drainage development in basaltic landscapes, but I’ll wait to say more about that until my publication and/or funding record bear me out.
I spent my afternoon thinking more about basalt hydrology, in a session on “Hydrologic Characterization and Simulation of Neogene Volcanic Terranes.” I’ve got lots of notes from that session that are probably of interest only to me, but I will say that it was exciting to hear one of the grad student speakers say to me “I’ve been reading your dissertation” and to hear my work cited more than once. It is such a relief to know that people working in the field actually find my work interesting or useful. Towards the end of the session, I gave a talk on the geomorphic and hydrologic co-evolution of the central Oregon Cascades Range. My talk was based on a paper that has undergone several major revisions since my Ph.D. days, and it was a pleasure to share the latest and greatest incarnation of my thinking on the subject. The pleasure was immeasurably increased by a recent letter from the journal editor giving me only very minor revisions to do before acceptance.
On Sunday evening, the attendees of the morning talks reconvened for a wine tasting with a geological theme – the terroir of taste of Oregon wines grown on basalt versus sandstone. The wine was donated by Willamette Valley Vineyards (basalt) and King Estate (sandstone), and we got to hear from the wine makers as we sipped their wares. According to them, if you see a 2008 Willamette Valley appellation Pinot Noir or Pinot Gris, snap it up. They reckon it will be the best year ever for Oregon wines. That’s saying quite a bit, since Oregon is consistently recognized as one of the world’s best Pinot producing regions.
After a day of stimulating talks and invigorating conversation, I was ready to dive into two days focused on groundwater-surface water interactions and a day of snow, mega-floods, and debris flows to round out my conference. But my notes on those days will have to wait for now, as those paper revisions are not taking care of themselves.

Categories: by Anne, conferences, geomorphology, hydrology, volcanoes

Stuff I linked to on Twitter last week

A post by Chris RowanMore interesting links that I’ve shared via Twitter over the past seven days.
Volcanic cone-ilicious! : Marion Island, South Africa.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=40806
(via @EarthObser)
Break out the stickyback plastic! : Build a high resolution spectrograph in 15 minutes.
http://sci-toys.com/scitoys/scitoys/light/spectrograph/spectrograph.html
(via @BoraZ, @sqfield)
Here’s what sea ice looks like from 20,000 ft from flight over Antarctica.
http://twitpic.com/lvtxg
(via @geogirldi, @mihaela4021, @NASA, @IceBridge)
LCROSS mission just posted new update: & images: But, no word on H2O detection.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/main/LCROSS_impact.html ,http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/main/LCROSS_impact_images.html
(via @elakdawalla)
Make sure to check out the animation : Cassini and IBEX results indicate heliosphere is a big bubble
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/cassinifeatures/newsrelease20091015/
(via @CassiniSaturn)
Cool webcam pictures from the ongoing eruption of Chaiten
http://volcanism.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/the-view-from-chaiten-15-october-2009/
Hmm. No real evidence for this so far : giant impact near India – not Mexico – may have doomed dinosaurs.
http://www.physorg.com/news174827113.html
(via @physorg_com)
A reminder that analogies can be stretched too far: important physical diffs between lava lamps and mantle convection.
http://www.physorg.com/news174764751.html
Fascinating eyewitness account of 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake.
http://scienceblogs.com/stressrelated/2009/10/the_great_california_shake_out.php
(via @stressrelated)
Video: Changes in Arctic sea ice coverage from 1978 to 2008.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/video/2009/oct/14/arctic-sea-ice-coverage
(via @guardianscience)
Check out this awesome photo compilation of erupting volcanoes.
http://pixdaus.com/?sort=tag&tag=volcano
(via @clasticdetritus)
Satellite imagery of tsunamI damage to Samoan coast :
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/view.php?id=40745
Very nice, polished piece by on physicists who go out on a limb as climate skeptics
http://arthur.shumwaysmith.com/life/content/the_arrogance_of_physicists
(via @mtobis, @arthursmith)
Solid evidence of paleo-lakes on Mars! >3 billion years old though, before you get too excited.
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/10/the-paleolakes-of-mars-are-fossil-fish-next.html
(via @geologynews)
Scientists seek truth on oil sands damage. "academic community has been pretty quiet" so far, it seems.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/scientists-seek-truth-on-oil-sands-damage/article1319806/
(via @geology4u)
Morphological differences between juvenile, adult dinosaurs might mean 1/3 of species ‘do not exist’.
http://www.physorg.com/news174634964.html
(via @physorg_com)
Awesome! Saturnian aurora!
http://planetary.org/blog/article/00002162/, longer animation http://planetary.s3.amazonaws.com/cassini/saturn_aurora_cassini_astro0.gif
(via @elakdawalla)
Literally Doomed. I think poor writing is due to not enough reading: you learn by exposure to good writing.
http://science-professor.blogspot.com/2009/10/literally-doomed.html
UK cities need portfolio of measures that minimize impact of climate change while allowing for growth
http://www.physorg.com/news174576543.html
WANT! Is this the coolest space exploration poster ever made?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/adamcrowe/4002050596/sizes/o/
(via @NatureNews, @DrStuClark, @ScienceSoWhat)
Airships set for Arctic’s heavy lifting
http://www.calgaryherald.com/entertainment/Airships+Arctic+heavy+lifting/2084159/story.html
Meltwater, patterned ground, debris flow levees and more on 0.5 km asteroid:
http://www.psi.edu/pgwg/images/oct09image.html
(via @aboutgeology)
Killer earthquakes shake scientific thought Could EQ cycles at diff plate boundary segments move into phase somehow?
http://www.physorg.com/news174481366.html
Research offers hope for oxygen, life in Europa’s oceans Based on chemistry of ice upwelling into surface cracks…
http://arizonageology.blogspot.com/2009/10/ua-research-offers-hope-for-oxygen-life.html

Categories: links

Blogging, tweeting and conferences

A post by Chris RowanThe Geological Society of America’s annual meeting starts tomorrow, and as Kim has already explained, the conference is actively encouraging geobloggers and geotweeters to report from the meeting. Since I’m on the wrong side of the Atlantic and thus unable to attend in person, I’ll get the opportunity to see just how much you can get out of a meeting through these media. As a warm up, I’m asking: what is the most effective way of blogging/tweeting a conference? Does an effective way actually exist?
I have myself done a bit of conference blogging. With one (prompted) exception, I’ve eschewed true ‘liveblogging’ – writing up conference sessions on the fly – because the demands of producing legible prose – or, at least, prose that my pedantic inner copy-editor is happy publishing – distracts me too much from actually following the presentations. However, I have attempted – and found useful – writing posts that summarise a day’s sessions. For the Science Online London conference, I experimented with live-tweeting: I found that the 140 character limit was actually a boon, as it forced a healthy balance between listening and typing, and the need to be succinct led to a useful set of notes when I wrote up my response on the train home the next day.
It has occurred to me, though, that my liveblogging endeavours thus far have been, for want of a better word, selfish. The exercise has some value to me, by helping to organise and preserve my thoughts and impressions of the talks that I attended. But I’m not sure how useful it is for a wider audience; does putting my musings online rather than in my notebook give other people a flavour of a conference? Does it highlight the talks that made waves, draw attention to the most cutting edge debates?
Based on my experience at the Science Online conferences, my feeling is that there is a critical mass issue here. If you only have a couple of people at a conference on Twitter, then all you get is a few isolated thoughts which are hard to put into context. If you have 50 people tweeting, however, then the social, crowdsourcing strengths of Web 2.0 (or whatever version we’re up to now) may start to become more apparent: observers both inside and outside the conference might start to get a sense of which sessions are proving to be interesting, and attendees who share interests and opinions may even have their attention drawn to each other, catalysing new discussions and collaborations. Likewise, if more people actually at the conference are aware of, and reading, what is being blogged about a particular session, then more might be motivated to contribute their own views and perspectives in the form of comments or other blog posts, which not only leads to the discussions that inevitably bubble around the main presentations being more integrated and coherent, but will also preserve them and make them available to a later, wider audience (I’ve wondered before if Google Wave might have an impact in this area).
Hopefully, you lot will provide your own perspectives on good approaches to blogging or tweeting or friendfeeding or social-application-of-the-month-ing conferences, both in terms of producing commentary and consuming it. What works for you? What is just meaningless noise? Perhaps you can also join me in observing the blogging and tweeting emerging from GSA over the next few days, and use that as fuel for further discussion.

Categories: academic life, conferences, public science

Earth Science Week Challenge Day 5: Earthquakes, volcanoes, and disasters, oh my

A post by Anne JeffersonThis week, we’re helping push the Geobloggers Giving Kids the Earth challenge, by promising that Chris or I will write a post on a topic chosen by our readers for each project that is fully funded by the end of the week.
To finish out the week with a rattle and boom, let’s push ourselves and round up $584 for a project on the “charismatic megafauna” of geology: volcanoes and earthquakes. Shake, Rattle, and Measure, is for a sixth-grade class in Arkansas that wants a seismograph model, erupting volcano pack, and books and DVDs about volcanoes and earthquakes. As their teacher writes:

The light of my life this year is my sixth grade class who appear to be so eager to learn just about anything. This is a high risk area that really could use any help you are willing to give. They are a very energetic group of young people who are going to do great things in life. These students have positive attitudes and with your help, I will try to help them reach their full potential.
The only thing standing in the way of greatness is the lack of supplies. The minds and willingness to do whatever it takes to achieve are the least of worries. This class has many bright and potential leaders. They are very interested in plate tectonics and are looking forward to the hands-on activities that the lab will provide.

Please spare a few dollars for “Shake Rattle and Measure” or give to another Oregon classroom in need of rocks, earth science books, and a globe. Don’t like the project I’ve picked? Take a look at the rest of the Geobloggers Giving Kids the Earth giving page and find the one the best suits your fancy.
Thanks to everyone for helping out. So far we have funded two of the projects I featured this week, and we are on our way to funding two more. On top of that, several other projects from the challenge were funded with donations from geoblog readers or members of the Earth Science Women’s Network. Thanks to all of our readers for playing along this week and putting up with my incessant begging. When Earth Science week is officially over – we’ll call it the start of formal sessions at GSA on Sunday morning – Kim and I will tally up the number of projects completed this week and let you know how to nominate topics for Chris and I to write about. I’ll be at GSA for pretty much all of next week, so I promise that if I manage to post at all, there will be a much higher science to fundraising ratio. But before I shush up, I will remind you that the geoblogger challenge lasts all month, and the need for donations to fund science in the public schools never goes away.

Categories: by Anne, earthquakes, science education, volcanoes

Earth Science Week Challenge Day 4: Rocks rocks rocks

A post by Anne JeffersonThis week, we’re helping push the Geobloggers Giving Kids the Earth challenge, by promising that Chris or I will write a post on a topic chosen by our readers for each project that is fully funded by the end of the week. We already owe you at least two posts, and I’ve encouraged a bunch of meteorologists to show up the geologists by funding the remaining weather projects.
Today is the day you’ve all been waiting for…the day I break down and actually give you a project about rocks. And for once, I don’t think I need to tell you why you should fund this project. We all know that it is awfully darn hard to learn about geology without getting your hands on a rock or two. So how about getting some rocks for a first-grade teacher from Oregon to use with her class of urban, high poverty students? These students are mostly English language learners from over 20 countries. In describing the project “We love rocks!“, she writes:

Our district requires a unit about rocks, but provides very little resources for the study of the unit. The students want to see and touch interesting rocks. These books, rock samples, and learning activity kits will help my students understand Earth science. Touching and interacting with the rocks we are learning about will enhance our learning. Your help will make it possible for my students in increase their academic language and understanding of Earth science. They will be so excited to have all of these wonderful books and rocks to learn from.

“We love rocks!” only needs $175 to be completed. If you happen to all get excited, you can get a head start on tomorrow’s featured project “Shake Rattle and Measure” or give to another Oregon classroom in need of rocks, earth science books, and a globe. Don’t like the project I’ve picked? Take a look at the rest of the Geobloggers Giving Kids the Earth giving page and find the one the best suits your fancy.

Categories: by Anne, rocks & minerals, science education