Christmas gifts for geologists: field beverages

Other suggestions: [Cameras] [Tough Gear] [Maps]
Finding an appropriately rock-orientated present for a geologist might seem a daunting task to the outsider. Raiding an outdoors shop can be risky, since they already seem to own more field gear than normal clothes; whilst buying them a pretty rock risks getting “Humph, it’s only quartz.” So, for those of you who are currently tempted to give up and give them a gift voucher, over the next few days I’ll be discussing a few possible options which would certainly go down well with my inner rock geek, so might also win you brownie points with the ones in your own life. The comments will doubtless provide agreements, disagreements and further suggestions from the rest of the geoblogosphere.
First up, there is the issue of liquid refreshment in the field, particularly the pressing issue of how the hell you’re supposed to get a decent caffeine fix when you’re away from civilisation. This is an especially serious problem if, like me, you consider instant coffee to be an abomination. In South Africa, I was eventually driven to taking my little Pyrex desk cafetiere with me on field trips, which was good for me, but not so good for the cafetiere, which at least had the courtesy to get me to the end of the Northern Cape trip in July before cracking up. Fortunately, somewhat more practical (and durable) options exist for field caffeination, in the form of toughened cafetiere mugs: once the coffee has brewed, you push down the plunger, and then drink straight out of them. I’ve looked enviously on ones like this before.

pressmug.jpg

Continue reading

Categories: field gear, fieldwork, gifts and gadgets

Year in blogging 2008

I quite liked this meme last year; it provides an overview of my blogging in the past 12 months, without taking up the time, or the excessive navel-gazing, required for a more traditional retrospective. I also really like Brian’s twist of posting the first image from each month, as well as the first sentence, so I’ve shamelessly borrowed it (in many cases, the image is linked to a different post than the sentence is).


I leave the question of what this all means – other than the fact that I’m fond of early month navel-gazing, and am rather too keen on long and complicated sentences – as an exercise for the reader.

Categories: bloggery

Carnivalling

Just as I was starting to worry about the state of the Accretionary Wedge, we’ve had not one but two calls for posts this week. Over at Geology News, Dave Schumaker will be hosting a late late November edition, and wants us to tell of our favorite places to do field work. Entries need to be in by this Sunday, and I went a little pretentious with mine
Meanwhile. the real December edition is being hosted by Kenneth Clark at the perplexingly-named Office of Redundancy Office, with the theme of “Recent Advancements” (recent and/or noteable advancements that have directly affected your expertise, interests, or the work you do). Entries should be in by Christmas Eve, or he might just post a lump of coal instead.
In the meantime, you might want to check out the (Totally Hot) December Issue of Scientae being hosted by Dr. Isis, not least because her request for explanations why “My Science is Hotter than Dr. Isis’s Naughty Monkeys Because…” was addressed pretty emphatically in the geoblogosphere with variations on a theme of “Because we do geology. Duh”. Oh, and we have better shoes, too (Naughty Monkeys are apparently footwear of some description, but I suspect that they’re about as far from all-terrain footwear as you can get).

Categories: bloggery, links

The best field areas are the ones that you haven’t seen yet

A scarily long time ago, now, I spent a summer walking around a small area in North Wales, just south of Snowdon. This was the field area for my undergraduate mapping project, which was a big turning point in my scientific life, in that the two years prior to this summer kind of sucked, and the years since then have been, on the whole, interesting and fun. At the time, the whole process was not without its frustrations. Trying to distinguish between volcaniclastic rocks directly deposited from volcanic ash flows, and reworked volcanically derived sediments, is not easy; trying to distinguish between the two when they’re almost completely covered with lichens is just a tad harder still. Add a fair amount of stuctural complexity to the niggling uncertainty that you may have wandered over a boundary and just not realised it, and you have a recipe for lots of evenings spent scratching my head as I tried to connect up all the different coloured patches on my field slips into a sensible pattern.
I remember one evening in particular, where I was trying to sort out the details of a particularly complicated area, and not really getting anywhere – or so it seemed. But then, as I squinted at the map in frustration once more, something suddenly clicked. What if- Oh. Yes! But that means- Yes!
I don’t know which bit of my brain had been holding out on me until this point, but suddenly a picture of the regional structure of my area popped into my head – and it all made perfect sense. Even better, this insight allowed me to predict exactly what I should find in the area that I was planning to walk through the next day. The next morning, I followed to route that I’d been planning, and all the different units cropped out pretty much exactly where I’d extrapolated they should.
That was a good day.
And thus, my time in North Wales was one of the first times that I experienced the happy buzz that comes from solving a tricky geological problem or puzzle; suddenly you see past the outcrop that you’re looking at to an environment or a tectonic event long departed, clearly realised in your head. It was certainly the first time that I’d done it all by myself, with no prompting from a lecturer. I wouldn’t be exaggerating if I said that that made me feel pretty damned good; and deeper down, my subconscious quietly noted the fact that maybe, just maybe, I could do this science thing after all.
So, does this make North Wales my favourite field area? Well, no. Because my fond memories are not so much due to the particular rocks there, as they are due to the pleasure I took in puzzling out, and understanding, the geological stories that they held. It’s been exactly the same in similar instances since; the rocks in New Zealand, or South Africa, may have been pretty cool in themselves, but my best memories are always associated with the spark of insight, the moment of “Oh, I see!” Because of that, I generally find myself looking forward to the place I’m going next, and the next geological puzzle to solve. So, in answer to Dave’s question for the next Accretionary Wedge, I have to say that my favorite field area is the next one. And the one after that, ad infinitum. Or, at least, a darn big finitum.

Categories: academic life, fieldwork, general science

The die is cast

wiki_logo.jpgWhen I initially signed up for ScienceOnline 09, I really wasn’t sure that I could afford to go. Now that I’m back in the UK, it’s a bit less of a financial drain to get to the US than it was from South Africa, but it’s still not cheap, exactly – and about a decade of not having very much money has made me a little bit hard on myself when it comes to allowing unnecessary expenses*.
But yesterday, I found myself in a ‘what the hell’ mood. I’m in a position where I can afford it (just about), and meeting fellow bloggers is always fun. So I bit the bullet, and booked my flights and hotel room for North Carolina. I feel most jet-settery.
*Or alternatively, I’m just naturally cheap and miserly.

Categories: bloggery