LCROSS impacts today!

A post by Chris RowanRemember Deep Impact? One space scientist commented at the time, “I can’t believe they pay us to have this much fun.” And it seems that they’ve managed to convince NASA to have more fun crashing stuff into other bits of our solar system – with the target this time being the Moon.
The impact plume kicked up by LCROSS when it impacts inside the crater Cabeus, near the Moon’s South Pole, will hopefully confirm the presence of small amounts of ice in the lunar subsurface.
The time of impact is around 11:30 UTC, which conveniently works out as lunchtime here in the UK. NASA and SLOOH are both providing live feeds of the event, that will hopefully include live pictures of the impact itself, and not just lots of gleeful scientists in mission control giggling that 5 year-olds (something which Twitter will happily provide). Still, I plan to tune in as I munch on my lunch. The actual scientific results, of course, will probably take a while to come out, so the immediate appeal is just seeing a big explosion…

Categories: geology, planets

Stuff I linked to on Twitter this week

A post by Chris RowanAnother set of interesting links for you.
BBC video: inside a destroyed village in Sumatra. Scary quake damage.
The podClast – episode 14 – The Geobloggers in the Pub: San Francisco episode.
(via @Yorrike)
Hey geology bloggers! … take this survey.
(via @clasticdetritus)
David Mitchell’s Observer piece on the impoance of curiosity-led research is brilliant.
(via @markgfh)
Fossils of ancient wood-rotting fungus suggests world’s forests were wiped out in end Permian extinction.
BBC NEWS: Malawi windmill boy with big fans. A real scrapheap challenge!
‘Planned recession’ could avoid catastrophic climate change. Good idea, will never happen.
(via @geographile, @Eah_News)
Large distant quakes increase number of small quakes on San Andreas.
(via @NatureNews)
International Continental Scientific Drilling Program does exist, although seems less active than IODP…
(From conversation with @stressrelated, @geologyclaire)
Experts draw up ocean-drilling wish list. Including renewing the quest to drill down to the Moho.
(via @NatureNews)
Is the Global Oil Tank Half-Full, Is It Half-Empty …or Are We Running on Fumes?
from (via @TheOilDrum)
Viking 2 missed Maian water by just inches. Possibly, anyway.
(via @Eah2larryo)
Reviews and the junior faculty member. How many is too many?
(via @ScienceBlogs)
Sichuan quake: rupture along multiple segments takes place “approximately once in 4,000 years”.
Updated 500+ science types on Twitter; now it’s much easier to follow the Scientwists.
(via @sciencebase)
For those who were asking, you can quite easily perform a custom Twitter search (either using this form or by a direct query) that returns posts containing a link by a particular user within a particular time period. I’m working on a script which then takes that output and does some basic reformatting to make the items more readable.

Categories: links

How to build a meandering river in your basement

A post by Anne JeffersonMeandering rivers are characterized by regularly spaced bends that grow and cutoff and generally march downstream in a fairly orderly fashion. Click the image below to watch a movie of meander migration on the Allier River near Chateau de Lys, France
Meander_Alier.jpg
Movie 1. Meander bend migration and cut off using aerial photos and maps from: 1945,1960,1971,1980,1982, 1992, 1995, and 1997 on the Allier River, France. Created by A. Wilbers, originally found here.
Though meandering rivers are by far the most common river form on Earth, building a meandering river in a laboratory flume eluded scientists for decades. The conditions necessary to support self-maintaining meandering rivers were not known well enough to recreate in the laboratory. Flumes, or experimental channels, are a really important tool for understanding river processes, because sediment and water influxes can be tightly controlled and high precision measurements made.
Sand and gravel, the most common sediments in river banks, have low cohesion. In flumes, channels through sand and gravel, even if initially forced into a meander form, inevitably end up as wide channels with active braid bars. Solving the bank cohesion problem, by replacing sand and gravel with silt and clay, results in flume channels that have lots of curvature (sinuousity) but do not maintain their geometry through multiple meander cut-offs. Over the last 10 years, graduate students Karen Gran and Michal Tal working with Chris Paola at the University of Minnesota figured out how to make a self-sustaining single channel in coarse sediment. The key to creating a single channel was to plant alfalfa seedlings to give the banks some cohesion. You can see the results of alfalfa growth in a Quicktime video of Tal’s experiments. (Click the image below.)
capture1.png

Movie 2. Tal and Paola’s experiments with alfalfa seedlings and channel form. More movies of these experiments here.
If you watched the video, you’ll notice that while the channel is indeed single thread and it does move around, the meanders don’t move downstream in the relatively orderly fashion of a natural river. So the insight of alfalfa sprouts from Gran and Paola (2001) and Tal and Paola (2007) got geomorphologists a long way towards understanding the controls on meander self-maintenance in coarse-bedded rivers, but they didn’t quite reach the finish line.
Now, a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences by UC Berkeley graudate student Christian Braudrick, his advisor Bill Dietrich and collaborators Glen Leverich and Leonard Sklar from San Francisco State University reports that they have succeeded where so many others have failed. In a 17-m long, 6.7 m wide flume, Braudrick and colleagues created a self-sustaining meandering channel. Their work was featured on National Public Radio’s Science Friday show, which produced the following video giving the basics of Braudrick’s process.

Movie 3. Science Friday’s video about Braudrick et al’s experiments.
One of the key things mentioned in the video, but not explained is why the lightweight sediment was plastic. In slimming down a river to fit within a laboratory, researchers have to take into account all of the possible scaling effects. That’s why alfalfa seedlings are used to simulate the grasses and trees of a normal riparian zone, for instance. The power of the water, or its shear stress, is a function of depth, slope, fluid density, and gravity. Since the depth of flume channels is so much smaller than real rivers, it means that the shear stress available to move sediment is much lower. This means flumes can’t move fist sizes pieces of gravel and the size of the sediment in the study must be scaled down accordingly. Gravel scales down reasonably well to coarse sand, but sand scales down to silt, and silt has much different cohesive properties than sand. This is where the plastic came in, because the researchers wanted to create meanders using the alfalfa to create cohesive banks not by adding cohesive sediment. The plastic beads were the size of very fine sand and they lacked cohesion. Thus, the researchers created laboratory conditions of that mimicked natural rivers – channel banks where there was a mixture of sizes of non-cohesive sediment held together by roots.
When the flume was turned on, the little plastic beads moved both along the channel bed and suspended within the water column, much as sand would do in a natural channel. With a small initial curvature at the upstream end of the flume, meanders propogated downstream and began to grow and cut off. In previous alfalfa-only experiments ( Tal and Paola, 2007), each time meanders were cut off, a trough was left on the upstream side of the abandoned meander. In natural systems, these troughs get plugged with fine sediment and create oxbow lakes that eventually fill in. In the alfalfa-only, the troughs persisted, opening the possibility of islands developing in the channel. In Braudrick’s alfalfa+plastic experiments, the little plastic beads moving in suspension filled in the troughs at the upstream end of the abandoned meander, blocking future flow through that old pathway.
From Braudrick and colleagues’ results, it appears that sand and fine sediment have an important role to play in reinforcing and maintaining the meandering pattern of river channels. Out in the real world, such fine sediment is often regarded as an undesirable pollutant of coarse-bedded rivers, so these results have the potential to change the goals of river restoration and management. Plus, now that geomorphologists have a way to simulate realistic meandering rivers in the flume, new insights into the controls and behavior of meandering rivers are likely to start pouring in.

Categories: by Anne, geomorphology

Two large earthquakes, two unusual focal mechanisms

A post by Chris RowanBoth of the earthquakes in the news this week occurred at convergent plate boundaries, and in that sense their focal mechanisms (Samoa, Indonesia) are not quite what you’d predict:

2quakes.png
What we see

If these two earthquakes were caused by a rupture of the main subduction thrust, you’d expect to see compressional focal mechanisms with the focal planes running parallel to the trend of the subduction zone, as below.

predictedfm.png
What we might expect

Instead, the Indonesian earthquake is the result of compression perpendicular to the expected direction, and the Samoan quake is accommodating extension on a normal fault, and not compression at all. So what’s going on?

The Samoan earthquake is actually quite easy to explain once you zoom in and note that it is located on a fault in the Pacific plate before it enters the subduction zone and is thrust westward underneath the Australian plate.

Tongazoom.jpg

This suggests that it is a response to bending of the Pacific plate as it sinks into the mantle.

tongaexpl.png

The Indonesian earthquake is less easy to explain: the rupture has been located at a depth of around 80 km, which puts it within the subducting Australian plate rather than at the subduction boundary itself. It also looks very similar to a quake which occured several hundred kilometres to the southwest at the beginning of September. Some force is squashing the plate at an angle perpendicular to the direction of plate convergence, but I’ve no real idea what the source is.

So, although both of these earthquakes occurred at a subduction zone, neither of them actually occurred on the main thrust. Another issue that has cropped up in the news is whether the Samoan earthquake on Tuesday caused the Indonesian earthquake on Wednesday. In a broad sense, the answer to that question is ‘no’. Both earthquakes were releasing strain built up by tectonic forces in their particular part of the the world; strain on the fault that ruptured beneath Indonesia had probably been building for hundreds of years prior to Wednesday, and it would have ruptured anyway at some point. However, given that it must have been on the verge of rupturing, could the seismic energy from the Samoan quake have provided an extra push over the threshold? It’s possible, but you can’t really say for sure either way.

Categories: earthquakes, geohazards, geology

Chris on the radio

A post by Chris RowanCompletely out of the blue, I’ve asked to participate in a discussion on natural disasters on the BBC World Service. The topic is presumably prompted by the two recent large earthquakes near Samoa and Indonesia, and it seems they want a tame geologist to talk about earthquake prediction (or the lack thereof).
The programme is called ‘World, Have Your Say‘ and is being broadcast live from 1805 BST (which I think is 1305 EST for you Americans). Hopefully I won’t sound too out of my depth.
[Update: For those who want to hear me, the programme is available on the BBC iPlayer for the next week. I pop up for brief periods throughout (9.00-10.30, 18.35-19.45, 34:00-37.30 and 49:50-51.30 mins). I think I did OK; I wish I’d gotten more of a chance to talk about the issues of long-term preparedness, and getting the information that we do have better embedded in public and political consciousness.]

Categories: bloggery, public science