Granites and their space problem

Look at a large-scale geological map and, provided the area is not covered in recent sediments, there will be large areas of red showing outcrops of granite. There are many ways in which rocks can be melted to produce granitic magma. But it’s long been recognised that there is a ‘space problem‘: how do those big red areas on a map form? How does the molten rock get there and where has all the rock that used to be there gone?

Nuptse south face geology annotated

How did all that granite fit into there?

The easy stuff

Let’s start with the easy explanations. First, intruding magma near the surface. There are a range of structures – sills, dykes1, laccoliths, and ring dykes – that are associated with intrusion of magma at shallow depths. All of these features involve magma moving along a plane of weakness (a fault or bedding in sedimentary rocks) and forming a relatively thin layer. Making the space is no problem – the magma can simply push the surface up. Satellite imaging of volcanoes often shows the surface rising up and down as magma moves about so no problem here.

Large areas of granite are more common at greater depth. If there is 10km of rock above, it is not obvious how the magma could push the surface up. Also a typical granite intrusion forms an oval shape on the surface – how does such a shape form?

Inadequate solutions

Papers on plate tectonics sometimes sketch out things in a cartoony way. For island arcs, where they want to show the extensive granite intrusions, people often draw as a blob, with a little tail at the bottom. It’s only a cartoon, but it conveys a popular but incorrect idea – that granite magma ascends as a diapir. 

In sedimentary basins it’s not uncommon for thick layers of salt to become unstable and for some to rise towards the surface as a blob-like diapir, like wax in lava lamp. For a long time it seemed plausible that light granite magma moved up through the crust in the same way. It would certainly explain the round shape of intrusions. However granite can only flow when it is hot. Unless it is in the lower crust (or perhaps in hotter Archaean crust), doing the maths shows that any granite diapir would cool and freeze long before it got anywhere.

Just say no to granite diapirs

Just say no to granite diapirs

Another concept that doesn’t quite explain how granite intrusions form is stoping. This is the process where blocks of the surrounding ‘country rock’ fall into the granite and are sometimes melted. Granites are often rich in such fragments (called xenoliths), but it is only a marginal effect. The vast majority of a granite intrusion is granite brought in from elsewhere – stoping doesn’t help explain how space is made for it.

Granite from Donegal. Xenoliths in microgranite near Polcrovehy. Courtesy of Carl Stevenson.

Granite from Donegal. Xenoliths in microgranite near Polcrovehy. Courtesy of Carl Stevenson.

Modern ideas

Melting of rocks to form granite magma is more common in the lower crust (it’s hotter down there). This is a continuous process and it turns out that it is fairly easy to squeeze out the magma, even if it only forms a small percentage of the melting rock. Rock-melt mixtures are very soft and easily deformed. When this happens, the magma is easily squeezed out and being light and under pressure, it moves its way upwards.

Part of the reason for the popularity of the diapir model was the thought that granite magma was too sticky to flow up dykes the way basaltic magma does. Basaltic magma on the surface (where we call it lava) flows beautifully, whereas lava of granitic composition flows only reluctantly – instead it tends to get stuck in the volcano which eventually explodes2.

More modern studies of the viscosity of granite magma show that within the middle crust, granite magma can easily flow up vertical cracks. It can do this extremely quickly and it can happen with small volumes of magma.

It turns out therefore, that all these great big red areas on geological maps are actually made up of many small batches of magma joined together, either as separate sheets or by mixing within a magma chamber. This makes sense – it more closely matches the record of surface vulcanism – volcanoes don’t grow overnight but through a series of many eruptions.

Gumbaranjon, Ladakh, India

Complex granite intrusion, with dark xenoliths. Gumbaranjon, Ladakh, India.

How do large intrusions form through multiple batches of magma? Just like shallow intrusions, they tend to make use of existing structures. Only in the middle crust these aren’t brittle structures and sometimes they are still moving as the granite arrives.

A good way of illustrating all this is to go to Ireland.

Irish men of granite

Before we get to the rocks – an interlude. For me the best granites are Irish for personal reasons. Much of the best research into granite emplacement has involved graduates of Queens University, Belfast. Donny Hutton, John Reavy, Ken McCaffrey and Carl Stevenson were all trained there and have worked on Irish granites. John Reavy taught me and I’ve encountered all the others in some way or other: for me granite is best pronounced with an Ulster accent.

To drift off on a tangent a little, a story John Reavy told me about being a trainee geologist in Northern Ireland during ‘the Troubles’. Belfast city centre was regularly bombed by terrorists during this time. Fancy buildings would be seriously damaged, their polished stone cladding (including granite) broken into pieces and flung about the shattered streets. Enterprising geologists would then pick up some nice samples, once the dust had settled. Life goes on, after all.

To Donegal

Back to the rocks.

Map of Donegal's granites. Taken from Stevenson et al. (2007)

Map of Donegal’s granites. Taken from Stevenson et al. (2007)

The granites of Donegal are classics. In the 1980s, a series of papers by Donny Hutton laid out the link between the granites and deformation of the surrounding rocks. A key finding was to show that the granite magma was intruded at the same time the surrounding rocks were being deformed. This was a neat trick, partly because at the time there was no way of dating deformation directly. Dating intrusions however, was possible.

Sometimes the Donegal granites were deformed after they became solid rock. We can tell this because all mineral grains are affected and some have flattened shapes.

Dextral shear – strong solid state fabric from the quartz in Donegal granite. Photo courtesy of Carl Stevenson

Strong ‘solid state’ fabric in Donegal granite, note the flattened quartz grains indiciating deformation of solid granite. Photo courtesy of Carl Stevenson

Some of the granite was deformed while partly liquid. In this case all the mineral grains look perfectly normal, only some structures are aligned. Minerals that form early in the crystallisation process may be aligned but are themselves undeformed – they were rotated as a crystal-melt mush was squashed.

Using such techniques, Donny Hutton showed that the Donegal granite formed within an active shear-zone. This led to a period of 10 years where pretty much every granite pluton in the British Isles had its intrusion linked to active structures. If rocks are deforming there are lots of ways in which space can be made for granite intrusions to form.

State of the art

When I was doing my undergraduate mapping in Donegal, the easiest bits to map were the granites. Granite was granite, as far as I was concerned – easily identified and quickly marked on the map. This was fine for that level, but with enough work, it’s possible to distinguish between individual batches of magma by clocking subtle differences in mineralogy or grain size. There’s a beautiful example of this from El Capitan in Yosemite.

Another technique tells you more about the structures within the granite. Some granites are rich in structures – aligned minerals or composition variation, you can find examples in many places. However granites that look featureless may contain minerals that are aligned. A technique called “anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility” or AMS allows us to measure the orientation of magnetic grains within the granite.  This can pick up fabrics even in weakly deformed granite (or other materials).

Applying these techniques to the Donegal granites allows a detailed picture to be built up.

The Main Donegal Granite (MDG) marks the site of a major crustal shear zone that provided a route of ascent for multiple batches of granite magma. It now is filled by sheets of granite, often deformed, that entered space created by dilation of the shear zone. Some batches of granite that ascended this way ‘leaked out’ of the shear zone.

One of the leaked batches ‘ballooned’ out, pushing the surrounding rocks out to form the circular Ardara intrusion. Other leaking batches intruded less forcefully, forming horizontal sheets (called laccoliths) that thicken out in domes to various degrees.

Diagram showing interaction between ascent and emplacement of Donegal granites. From Carl Stevenson

Diagram showing interaction between ascent and emplacement of Donegal granites. From Carl Stevenson

The space problem solved

The Donegal granites demonstrate two processes that are of global significance: how granites ascend and how they are emplaced. Vertical structures allow granite magma to flow up in small batches. At a particular level in the crust they migrate sideways and are emplaced, often as horizontal sheets.

By using existing structures and building up intrusions via small batches, there is no need to massively deform the surrounding rocks, the way diapirs would have to. Looking at a map view of granites, a sea of red, it is hard to think where the rock that used to be there has gone. As often in geology, the answer is to think in 3 dimensions – the rock was either pushed up (and has since been eroded) or was pushed down under the granite. Thinking about the crust as a whole, moving granite magma from the lower crust into higher rocks doesn’t involve a significant change of volume. Material melted out of the depths creates a sheet in the middle crust, pushing down the intervening rocks.

A theme of granite intrusion studies from Ireland and Scotland is the importance of pre-existing structures, particularly active ones. In detail, two sets of structures are important – the main MDG shear zone and a nearly-N-S lineament, that is believed to be linked to a major crustal structure.

Work on the equivalent rocks in Scotland (by Jacques and Reavy) presents a regional model where the lower crust is made up of a series of ‘lozenges’ formed by the intersection of two sets of structures (one set related to contemporary plate tectonic movements, the other pre-existing). Granite intrusions are predominantly found where these structures intersect. Movements along them may have influenced the siting of melting, the ascent of the granite and also their emplacement.

The problem of how granite intrusions form has long been known of. The tale of how it was solved is a typically geological one, requiring the synthesis of many techniques and the application of ‘four-dimensional thinking’. A problem best seen in a geological map can be solved by thinking how rocks move vertically and change over time.

References

Stevenson C.T.E., Hutton D.H.W. & Price A.R. (2006). The Trawenagh Bay Granite and a new model for the emplacement of the Donegal Batholith, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 97 (04) 455-477. DOI:

Petford N., Cruden A.R., McCaffrey K.J. & Vigneresse J.L. Granite magma formation, transport and emplacement in the Earth’s crust., Nature, PMID:

Stevenson C. (2009). The relationship between forceful and passive emplacement: The interplay between tectonic strain and magma supply in the Rosses Granitic Complex, NW Ireland, Journal of Structural Geology, 31 (3) 270-287. DOI:

JACQUES J.M. & REAVY R.J. (1994). Caledonian plutonism and major lineaments in the SW Scottish Highlands, Journal of the Geological Society, 151 (6) 955-969. DOI:

Exciting extraterrestrial eclogites

Eclogites are beautiful rocks that on Earth are associated with the process of subduction – where pieces of crust sink into the deep mantle region. A recent paper by Makoto Kimura and 5 other Japanese authors, describes the first ever evidence of eclogitic rocks found beyond Earth, formed within an unusually large asteroid now found only as tiny pieces.

ZS Unit Aosta valley, glaucophane bearing eclogite (scanned thin section 50x30mm) showing that glaucophane may be stable under eclogite facies, together with omphcite + grt _ rutile

A terrestrial eclogite in thin-section

Our authors were studying samples of a meteorite1 called a chondrite. It contains numerous small fragments (“clasts”) of different types. The paper focuses on a single set of clasts that contain distinctive eclogitic minerals – omphacite and pyrope-rich garnet. The sample also contains more typical minerals such as olivine and orthopyroxene. All of the Sodium and Aluminium within the sample is found within the garnet and omphacite – indicative of formation under high pressure. Based on the black arts of geothermobarometry our authors estimate formation under conditions of 2.8–4.2 GPa and 940–1080 °C.

On earth, eclogitic minerals are associated with subduction because this is a process that makes rocks experience high pressures and provides mechanisms for getting them back to the surface where we can enjoy then. This meteorite sample formed in a different world 2 – so there is no need to infer subduction on another body, but it is still remarkable (comment added later). To quote the paper: “It is believed that meteorites formed in small asteroidal bodies under very low-pressure conditions, except for the high pressures produced during secondary impact events, as recorded in features such as shock veins.” But these high-pressure minerals do not appear to have been formed in a shock vein, but within the interior of an unusually large asteroidal body (that was later smashed into pieces).

How large a body would this need to be? On earth, pressures like this are found at 100km depth. Does this mean the asteroid could have been 100km in radius? No. The pressure is caused by the weight of the rocks above and so relates to the gravitational pull of the entire body. The smaller the body, the lower the force of gravity. Back of the envelope calculations suggest that in order to achieve these pressures, the asteroid would need to have a radius of 1000s of kilometres – getting into planet territory. By comparison, the pressure at the core of our (unusually large) moon has been estimated to be 4.5GPa 3, which is only slightly higher than the upper pressure estimate from these samples.

This study is based on a tiny fragment of rock – only three thin sections. But from this, we can infer there once existed a huge piece of rock, now smashed into countless fragments. All thanks to our understanding the way minerals behave under different conditions.

Update: I do like Twitter. Various geotweeps found this story as interesting as I did. @lockwooddewit has long suspected that some types of meteorite (such as kamacite Fe-Ni ones) “suggest major differentiated body existed“. Pieces of eclogitic mantle would be consistent with this. Ryan Brown (@glacialtill) pointed out that “we know planets were differentiating w/in the first few million years of the soar system- few survived though“.

One thing that struck me my untutored eye was how remarkable it would be that a large body could form and be destroyed and the only trace be a tiny fragment in one meteorite. Andrew Alden (@aboutgeology) points out in a post that there is an obvious candidate – Theia – “the “Mars-sized object” that is thought to have collided with Earth, way back in the Hadean Eon, to create the mess that formed the Moon.

One striking thing about the paper is the lack of speculation  about the source of this material – the guessing all comes from me and the folks mentioned above. The last paragraph suggests there is more to come from Kimura et al. – “The precursor materials of the clasts, and the genetic relationships between the clasts and the host CR chondrite, are not yet clear. We are now measuring the isotopic and trace element compositions of the clasts, which will shed light on this issue.”  Studies like this have a great record of tracing events from the early solar system. I look forward to their next paper.

References

Many thanks to @TriclinicFlow (Konstantinos) for alerting me to this paper:

Kimura M., Sugiura N., Mikouchi T., Hirajima T., Hiyagon H. & Takehana Y. (2013). Eclogitic clasts with omphacite and pyrope-rich garnet in the NWA 801 CR2 chondrite, American Mineralogist, 98 (2-3) 387-393. DOI:

Height, speed and distance: the view above my back garden

I’ve bought a deck chair this Summer and it’s got me thinking. As I’ve sat in it – enjoying some peace until the moment when my children and ‘playing nicely together’ abruptly part company – I’ve been looking at the sky and thinking about space, distance and speed.

Photo via Alessandro Giangiulio via CC.

Photo via Alessandro Giangiulio via CC.

The view of the sky from my deck chair has many levels. First there are pigeons, flying between trees a few metres above me along little drooping arcs. Next are the red kites, effortlessly circling above, on the look out for carrion (I take care to move occasionally in my chair). Speeds are low. A pigeon, closely followed a sparrow hawk once zoomed just over my shoulder at thrilling speed, but away from the business of killing or eating, nothing moves fast.

Moving up in height, little propeller-driven planes from a nearby airfield are next. To me they resemble bumblebees – a quiet buzzing, slow progress. There are odd moments of drama when they perform acrobatics. When they dive straight to the ground they make a ‘Nazi-plane-shot-down-in-flames’ noise. The lowest section of their downward loop is hidden by houses and I find myself waiting for an explosion, but they always pull up again. So far. They move fast, 100s of kilometres an hour, but they are always at least a few kilometres away.

Next come the jet planes. A handy phone app allows me to quantify their height – the many many flights into or from nearby Heathrow are a few kilometres up, travelling at 300 kph. From a bedroom window I can sometimes see the flight path – multiple planes strung out across the evening sky as dots of light.

Some planes are not Heathrow bound, but are high, travelling from Ireland to Europe or Germany to America. These are ten kilometres or more above, little more than specks. Often the bit of the ground they are above is a surprisingly far distance away. If you want a view over a long distance, just look up into the sky. Without a geeky app to help, you can only tell these planes are there if they leave contrails, or via their lights at night. They are speeding along at 640 kph and the ratio of their distance to their speed is about the same as the little planes – so to me they move at much the same speed.

Higher things are only visible at night. The International Space Station is a rare visitor but it doesn’t stay long. At 370 kilometres height it is of course only a dot, but impressively fast as it tracks across the sky at 7.66 km/s, nearly 28,000 kph. It is 40 times further away than the jet planes, but moves nearly a hundred times faster. From my perspective, that’s about as fast as a circling red kite.

The fastest things in the sky are rare visitors: shooting stars. These little fragments – broken up planets or sweepings left over from the formation of the solar system – travel at ‘cosmic velocities’, around 30 kilometers a second (over 100,000 kph). Faster than the ISS they are also closer, burning up in the atmosphere at around 100 km in height.  Like a sparrow hawk you can’t calmly measure their speed. Rather they are experienced as a sudden dramatic event, a glimpse into another, faster world.

I really like my deck chair.

Ireland: good terrain for terrane training

The word terrane has a very specific geological meaning. Usually short for tectonostratigraphic terrane, they’ve been defined as “fault-bounded crustal blocks that preserved a geological record distinct from that of adjacent terranes” (Jones
et al., 1983).

The concept was first coined as a way of understanding the rocks of the North America Cordillera. We know now this area is a collage of different terranes that were added (“accreted”) to the proto-North American plate (Laurentia). Some formed part of the core continental plate. Others formed within the vanished ocean, as pieces of volcanic arc, accretionary wedge or oceanic crust. Others are pieces of continental crust that came from further afield, such as Arctic Norway.

Getting around British Columbia or Alaska is hard and dangerous (think helicopters and grizzly bears). Doing geology in the West of Ireland is much easier (think mini-buses and pubs). This explains its popularity for university field trips. During the Ordovician, various pieces of oceanic and arc crust were scraped onto the Laurentian continent in what is now Ireland. This makes it good terrain for terrane training1.

Getting a handle on a complex jumble of terranes requires geologists to draw on a whole range of geological data. There are some specific concepts that relate to terrane analysis, all nicely illustrated in the west of Ireland.

Terrane map of the British Isles. Figure 1a from Dewey 2005

Terrane map of the British Isles. Figure 1a from Dewey 2005

Fossil evidence

Fossils can be used to get a handle on whether particular terranes were near each other or not. A classic example of this comes from the British Isles. In the 1940s, Stuart McKerrow was a young man on the Atlantic convoys, constantly menaced by Nazi submarines while ferrying American materiel to a hungry Britain . While not winning medals for bravery2, he found time to ponder a mystery. Cambrian rocks in Newfoundland, one end of his dangerous journey, contained trilobites that closely matched fossils from his native Scotland. Oddly trilobites of the same age from England and Wales were very different. Surely it would have made more sense if the fossils from opposite sides of the Atlantic were different, in the same way modern animals are different across oceans.

dx

Diagram showing Iapetus suture as picked out by fossils. Image from Wikipedia

Of course now we understand that the Atlantic did not exist in the Cambrian. During his later career as a geologist at Oxford University, Stuart McKerrow joined others in showing that the line of a vanished ocean, Iapetus, can be traced across the British Isles. Wales and Scotland started off on opposite sides of this ocean. At certain times, species that live in the deep sea were the same, but shallow water (benthic) animals were different – something that requires an intervening body of deep water. His work involved detailed studies of fossils on both sides of the Atlantic, picking out the pattern of plates and terranes, showing how they moved during the closure of the Iapetus ocean.

Stitching pluton

A stitching pluton is an igneous intrusion that joins two or more terranes together. Simple field relationships will show that the intrusion cuts into the rocks of the terranes. The intrusion is therefore younger than them, plus the terranes were adjacent when the magma was intruded. Dating the age of intrusions is relatively simple which means stitching plutons are a simple way to constrain when two terranes were joined.

Diagram of Connemara and surround regions. Figure 1b from Dewey 2005

Diagram of Connemara and surround regions. Figure 1b from Dewey 2005

The Galway Granite is a large batholith found on Connemara’s south coast. To its north are the metamorphic rocks of the Dalradian Supergroup. Formed on the Laurentia continent, these rocks were deformed by the Caledonian/Taconic orogeny around 475-460Ma. To the South of the Galway Granite, the South Connemara group is a tectonic melange including abyssal cherts and mafic volcanics with chemistry suggesting they formed at a mid-ocean ridge. These rocks formed at a Ordovician subduction trench.

These two terranes formed in very different tectonic environments, but by 420 million years ago they were next to each other, ready to be permanently stitched together by the Galway granite.

Sedimentary linkages and overlap assemblages

Another way of showing two terranes have become close to each other is to show that pieces of one were eroded into a sedimentary basin on the other. For example conglomerates in the trench rocks of the South Connemara group contain distinctive rock-types common in the Connemara Dalradian terrane to the north. This would suggest the two terranes were nearby while the South Connemara group was forming – that the subduction trench lay along a line now obscured by the Galway Granite.

In a similar way, detailed studies of heavy minerals in the South Mayo Trough  and samples of distinctive igneous rock types can be used to date when the Connemara terrane moved close by. Connemara is the only piece of Dalradian found to the south of the Iapetan arc terranes. For this reason it is thought to have been shifted into its current position by strike slip faulting during the Ordovician.

There is a sedimentary linkage between Connemara and the South Mayo rocks – a set of Silurian rocks that lie unconformably on both terranes. This puts a upper limit on the timing of relative movement. Unfortunately it also obscures the actual contact. The details of how Connemara arrived in its current location remain a mystery.
The concept of terranes is extremely important. Terranes form a vital bridge between the bewildering detail that a field geologist has to deal with and the simple concepts of plate tectonics.

References

Jones, D.L., Howell, D.G., Coney, P.J., and Monger, J.W.H., 1983, Recognition, character and analysis of tectono-stratigraphic terranes in western North America, in Hashimoto, M., and Uyeda, S., eds., Accretion Tectonics in the Circum-Pacific
Region: Terra, Tokyo, p. 21–35.

Dewey J.F. (2005). Inaugural Article: Orogeny can be very short, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102 (43) 15286-15293. DOI:

Brown D., Ryan P.D., Ryan P.D. & Dewey J.F. (2011). Arc-continent collision in the Ordovician of western Ireland: stratigraphic, structural, and metamorphic evolution, Arc-Continent Collision, 373-401. DOI: