Algae and earthquake precursors

From ye olde blog, May 2006: an interesting report from the BBC:

Concentrations of the natural pigment chlorophyll in coastal waters have been shown to rise prior to earthquakes.

These chlorophyll increases are due to blooms of plankton, which use the pigment to convert solar energy to chemical energy via photosynthesis.

This is based on an article by Singh et al. [doi] in Advances in Space Research, part of a special issue devoted to the use of satellite remote sensing for studying and predicting natural hazards such as earthquakes. The authors claim that you can detect a rise in sea surface temperature just before large coastal earthquakes. The blooms observed in this study are, they say, result from an increased flow of heat energy from the ocean to the atmosphere, enhancing the upwelling of cold, nutrient rich water and fuelling a boom in the growth of photosynthetic algae.
This is all very interesting, but what is unclear in the paper is the reason so much heat energy is being released prior to the earthquake, which is itself releasing accumulated strain energy. And, looking at the paper, I’m not really sure the relationship is quite as clear-cut as is claimed.

Continue reading

Categories: earthquakes, geohazards, geology, paper reviews

Gone drillin’

I’m off for a week to collect some samples. It’s the first time I’ve actually handled a drill since my last field season in New Zealand way back in 2003 (a scarily long time ago, now I think of it), but it’s merely the first in several collecting trips I’m planning in the next few months. Anyway, this is where I’m going to be sampling.

Sat.jpg

Before Brian starts crying plagiarism, I’m not expecting you to guess where this is – the image is less than 10 km wide, after all. Instead, I’m going to overlay the outcrop geology of the section I’m looking at.

Sat1.jpg

The red areas in the south-west are basement granites of the Kaapvaal Craton, which have been dated at about 3 billion years old. The different coloured units above it represent pretty much the oldest cratonic cover sequence anywhere – at least, the oldest that hasn’t been mashed beyond all recognition by metamorphism. I’m going to be sampling two volcanic formations (the purple and green units) in the hope that there’s still an original magnetic signal in there somewhere. Of course, I won’t know that for several months yet.
Whilst I’m away, I’ve got a couple of reposts from ye olde blog scheduled, although some of us Sciblings have been having problems with that recently, so apologies if nothing appears.

Categories: geology

A primer on the origin of the Earth

I heartily second Lab Lemmings recommendation of the Skepchick’s series on ‘The Origin of the Earth’, an opus in five parts:


If my post on the composition of the Earth left you wondering exactly how it got that way, this series (particularly parts III-V) is for you.

Categories: basics, links, planets

Lusi flows on

The latest from Lusi
It’s been a couple of months since I’ve posted about Lusi, the Indonesian mud volcano, mainly because I hadn’t found anything significant to report. Sadly, in this case, it seems that no news was bad news, and last week’s reports that one of the dykes preventing the sludgy tide from engulfing more of Surabaya had burst seems to confim that despite some early optimism, the mad concrete ball-dropping scheme has failed to appreciably stem the flow.
Today comes news that the Indonesian authorities are set to try a new strategy, although at present none of the stories I’ve read seem particularly clear on what this actually involves. According to Physorg:

The latest attempt will try to plug the mudflow using inverted pressure in the area where spoil has built up around the crater.

I have no idea what ‘using inverted pressure’ means. Given the mention of ‘spoil’, I’m hoping that it’s not just a posh way of saying ‘try to block the vent by dumping stuff in it’. Any ideas?

Categories: geohazards, Lusi

Tony Blair liked science, but he didn’t understand it

So, Tony Blair has finally decided to call it a day. Relocating a few thousand miles away has had the fortunate effect of insulating me from the British media’s obsession with when/whether/how he was going to step down as PM, and whether anyone other than Gordon Brown was going to take the helm – the papers here have their own succession issues to get excited about. I never really rated him as a leader (as opposed to a politician), and although I hoped to be proven wrong I was not particularly surprised by the way his government’s rhetoric never seemed to be matched by action. However, I actually have some sympathy for him over Iraq, which was basically just the most tragic of many instances where he overestimated his ability to persuade and influence people.
It’s probably a little early to be talking about Tony Blair’s ‘legacy’, but of course, that’s not stopping anyone. Over at one of the New Scientist blogs, the question has been given a scientific spin. They reference this interview they had with him back in November last year (there’s even a podcast if you want to hear everything, and further discussion at the New Scientist newsblog), and I think my response to that on ye olde blog, reposted below the fold, sums up why I’d give him a 2:2 at best.

Continue reading

Categories: public science, ranting