{"id":2201,"date":"2021-04-26T21:31:09","date_gmt":"2021-04-27T01:31:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/?page_id=2201"},"modified":"2024-11-05T06:41:06","modified_gmt":"2024-11-05T11:41:06","slug":"restoring-disturbed-landscapes","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/research\/restoring-disturbed-landscapes\/","title":{"rendered":"Restoring Disturbed Landscapes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>While urban sprawl contributes to deforestation, many areas in the US now have more forests than they did a century \u2013 or a few decades \u2013 ago. These afforested areas are super-imposed on landscapes with a legacy of human activities, including agriculture and mining. Both abandoned agricultural lands and reclaimed mine sites feature disrupted drainage networks and altered soil profiles and properties, relative to their pre-disturbance conditions. These changes alter the partitioning of water between the surface and subsurface and may affect success and ecohydrology of reforestation efforts.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve also worked on legacy effects\u00a0of intensive agriculture on modern\u00a0channel head positions, stream sediments impacted by acid mine drainage, and island growth upstream of dams. If humans historically altered the landscape, there is science to be done to understand how it functions now and how we might alter function through restoration activities.<\/p>\n<h2>Recent Research<\/h2>\n<div id=\"attachment_1999\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/IMG_0353-e1535837770795.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1999\" class=\"wp-image-1999 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/IMG_0353-e1619486338902-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"Woman with baseball hat holding stick above PVC pipe in grassy field, with forest in background.\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/IMG_0353-e1619486338902-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/IMG_0353-e1619486338902-268x200.jpg 268w, https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/IMG_0353-e1619486338902.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1999\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Grad student Catherine Ruhm shows off a crest stage gage at one of the sites slated for restoration in Cuyahoga Valley National Park.<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>Reforesting Reclaimed Mines:<\/strong> In partnership with Cuyahoga Valley National Park, the FoSTER (Forest Soil and Trees Ecosystem Restoration) project aims to (1) understand why abandoned and reclaimed surface mine and quarry sites have failed to reforest and (2) study the effectiveness of new restoration efforts including deep ripping and volunteer-led tree planting. My collaborators on the project are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kent.edu\/biology\/profile\/christopher-blackwood\">Dr. Chris Blackwood<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/bahlailab.org\">Dr. Christie Bahlai<\/a>. If afforestation is successful, we hope to use these sites as long term ecohydrologic research laboratories, where we can watch the co-evolution of soils, hydrology, and above and below-ground ecosystems. You can hear me talk about the project in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kent.edu\/elevations\/news\/dr-anne-jefferson-assistant-professor-geology-department-kent-state\">6 minute interview<\/a> recorded in spring 2018. <em>Catherine Ruhm<\/em> completed a MS thesis characterizing the sites&#8217; soils prior to deep-ripping, and\u00a0<em>Mike Back<\/em>\u00a0completed an undergraduate Honors thesis on bulk density profiles within and between of ripped areas.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Back, M.P.<\/em>, Jefferson, A.J., <em>Ruhm, C.T.<\/em>, Blackwood, C.B. 2024. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.geoderma.2024.116788\">Effects of reclamation and deep ripping on soil bulk density and hydraulic conductivity at legacy surface mines in northeast Ohio, USA<\/a>. <em>Geoderma,<\/em> 442, 116788. dot: 10.1016\/j.geoderma.2024.116788<\/li>\n<li><em>Ruggles, T.A.<\/em>, Gerrath, J.A.,\u00a0<em>Ruhm, C.T.<\/em>,\u00a0Jefferson, A.J., Davis, C.A., and Blackwood, C.B. 2021.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1002\/ldr.3904\">Reclaimed surface mines show little progress towards native species forest restoration following 35 years of passive management<\/a>.\u00a0<em>Land Degradation and Development.\u00a0<\/em>32(7): 2351-2359.<em>\u00a0<\/em>doi: 10.1002\/ldr.3904<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Previous Projects<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Acid Mine Drainage Impacts<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Singer, D.M.,\u00a0Jefferson, A.J.,\u00a0<em>Traub, E.L.,\u00a0<\/em>and Perdrial, N. 2018.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.elementascience.org\/articles\/10.1525\/elementa.286\/\">Mineralogical and geochemical variation in stream sediments impacted by acid mine drainage is related to hydro-geomorphic setting<\/a>.\u00a0<em>Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene.<\/em>\u00a06(1): 31. doi:10.1525\/elementa.286<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Reforested Agricultural Lands<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Jefferson, A.\u00a0and\u00a0<em>McGee, R.W.<\/em>\u00a02013.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/esp.3308\/abstract\">Channel network extent in the context of historical land use, flow generation processes, and landscape evolution in the North Carolina Piedmont<\/a>,\u00a0<em>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms<\/em>, 38(6): 601-613, doi: 10.1002\/esp.3308<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Dams<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Freyer, J.B.<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0Jefferson, A., 2013.<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S2213305413000283\">\u00a0An exception to island loss in the engineered Upper Mississippi River: history of land growth in Pool 6 and implications for restoration<\/a>,\u00a0<em>Anthropocene.<\/em>, 2: 65-75, doi:10.1016\/j.ancene.2013.10.004.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While urban sprawl contributes to deforestation, many areas in the US now have more forests than they did a century \u2013 or a few decades \u2013 ago. These afforested areas are super-imposed on landscapes with a legacy of human activities, including agriculture and mining. Both abandoned agricultural lands and reclaimed &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":888,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"ub_ctt_via":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2201","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"featured_image_src":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2201"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2201\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2320,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2201\/revisions\/2320"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/888"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/jefferson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}