{"id":3590,"date":"2010-02-12T14:15:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-12T14:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/2010\/02\/neoproterozoic-signs-of-life\/"},"modified":"2010-08-18T04:27:35","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T09:27:35","slug":"neoproterozoic-signs-of-life","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/2010\/02\/neoproterozoic-signs-of-life\/","title":{"rendered":"Neoproterozoic signs of life"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"float: left; padding: 5px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/chrisicon2.jpg\" width=\"49\" height=\"50\" alt=\"A post by Chris Rowan\"\/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.researchblogging.org\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"ResearchBlogging.org\" src=\"http:\/\/www.researchblogging.org\/public\/citation_icons\/rb2_mid.png\" style=\"border:0;\"\/><\/a><\/span>Fossils older than the base of the Cambrian &#8211; 542 million years ago &#8211; are not exactly abundant, so it was interesting to see not one, but two interesting papers in the latest issue of <i>Geology<\/i> that describe fossils from the Neoproterozoic period, from 1000 to 542 million years ago.<br \/>\nThe first paper reports the discovery of 565 Ma trace fossils found at Mistaken Point in Newfoundland. Mistaken Point is the location of a nice section across the Cambrian boundary, and hosts the oldest known fossilised <a href=http:\/\/www.ucmp.berkeley.edu\/vendian\/mistaken.html>Ediacaran macrofauna<\/a> (at least 10 million years older than <a href=https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/2007\/06\/namibia-precambrian-fossils\/>the ones I&#8217;ve seen in Namibia<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/mistaken4.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"368\" alt=\"mistaken4.jpg\"\/><br \/><b>Ediacaran fossil, Mistaken Point. <a href=http:\/\/www.ucmp.berkeley.edu\/vendian\/mistaken.html>Source<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n<p>Ediacarans have generally been interpreted as immobile, bottom-dwelling filter feeders, but <a href=http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1130\/G30368.1>Liu <i>et al.<\/i><\/a> have discovered a horizon in the sequence that appears to show that <em>something<\/em> was moving around:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/Mistaken_Point_Trace.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"165\" alt=\"Mistaken_Point_Trace.jpg\"\/><br \/><b>Source: Liu et al., Figure 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p>These trail-like features are found on the top of a fine green mudstone unit, laid down in deep water, that is capped by a volcanic tuff (which probably helped in their preservation). Liu <i>et al.<\/i> found 70 tracks about 1cm wide and up to 17 cm long. The crescent shaped ridges within the grooves, and their marginal ridges indicate that they have been formed by sediment being pushed aside and piled up by something moving through it. The lack of any consistent orientation, and the fact that a fair number are curved, indicating a change in the direction of motion, makes it unlikely that they are formed by something being passively dragged along by a current.<br \/>\nIt is not known what manner of creature might have made the trails, as none are preserved at the same stratigraphic level; the only possible clue is that the tracks sometimes end in circular impressions which might mark where the creature that made the trails was resting before or after moving. Whilst the authors say that the possibility of them being made <a href=https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/2008\/11\/single-celled-trace-fossils\/>by giant single-celled protists<\/a> cannot be discounted, they remark that modern sea anenomes can leave similar trails..<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/anenome_trail.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"610\" alt=\"anenome_trail.jpg\"\/><\/p>\n<p>It seems, then, that an anenome-like creature (in terms of body form and\/or mode of life, at least, if not direct descent) is their favoured culprit.<br \/>\nThe second paper concerns these unusual microfossils from the Tindir group of northwestern Canada:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/Tindir_microfossil.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"411\" alt=\"Tindir_microfossil.jpg\"\/><br \/><b>Scale bar is 15 &mu;m. Source: Macdonald <i>et al.<\/i>, Figure 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p>The little mineralised scales are quite interesting; the appearance of mineralised body parts is also associated with the Cambrian diversification, although the whys and wherefores are still disputed. Modern scale-forming groups of micro-organisms are also all eukaryotes, which suggests (although does not prove) that these critters were too. So from an evolutionary perspective, they&#8217;re quite interesting; unfortunately the sequence they were found in was not particularly well-dated, so based mainly on fossils like this they were placed close to the Cambrian boundary. With some more thorough mapping and geochemical correlations, however, <a href=http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1130\/G25637.1>Macdonald <i>et al.<\/i><\/a> have shown that the fossil-bearing formations were deposited prior to glacial deposits linked to the period of extreme &#8220;Snowball Earth&#8221; glaciations between about 750 and 635 million years ago. This means that the microfossils pictured above must be at least 750 million years old. Since the Snowball Earth theory proposes an extreme winnowing of most life due to the whole Earth being frozen over, this is a valuable glimpse at what might have occupied the pre-Snowball world, and tests the biological part of the hypothesis.<br \/>\nTaking a wider perspective, what both of these papers demonstrate is that whilst the the dawn of the Cambrian clearly marked the diversification of mobile, active animals and biomineralisers, the story of their first origins appear to have begun earlier, possibly much earlier; something to bear in mind when we are trying to link biological changes on the ancient Earth to wider geological events.<br \/>\n<span class=\"Z3988\" title=\"ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&#038;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&#038;rft.jtitle=Geology&#038;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1130%2FG30368.1&#038;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fresearchblogging.org&#038;rft.atitle=First+evidence+for+locomotion+in+the+Ediacara+biota+from+the+565+Ma+Mistaken+Point+Formation%2C+Newfoundland&#038;rft.issn=0091-7613&#038;rft.date=2010&#038;rft.volume=38&#038;rft.issue=2&#038;rft.spage=123&#038;rft.epage=126&#038;rft.artnum=http%3A%2F%2Fgeology.gsapubs.org%2Fcgi%2Fdoi%2F10.1130%2FG30368.1&#038;rft.au=Liu%2C+A.&#038;rft.au=Mcllroy%2C+D.&#038;rft.au=Brasier%2C+M.&#038;rfe_dat=bpr3.included=1;bpr3.tags=Geosciences%2CPaleontology%2C+Biogeosciences\">Liu, A., Mcllroy, D., &#038; Brasier, M. (2010). First evidence for locomotion in the Ediacara biota from the 565 Ma Mistaken Point Formation, Newfoundland <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Geology, 38<\/span> (2), 123-126 DOI: <a rev=\"review\" href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1130\/G30368.1\">10.1130\/G30368.1<\/a><\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"Z3988\" title=\"ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&#038;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&#038;rft.jtitle=Geology&#038;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1130%2FG25637.1&#038;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fresearchblogging.org&#038;rft.atitle=Early+Neoproterozoic+scale+microfossils+in+the+Lower+Tindir+Group+of+Alaska+and+the+Yukon+Territory&#038;rft.issn=0091-7613&#038;rft.date=2010&#038;rft.volume=38&#038;rft.issue=2&#038;rft.spage=143&#038;rft.epage=146&#038;rft.artnum=http%3A%2F%2Fgeology.gsapubs.org%2Fcgi%2Fdoi%2F10.1130%2FG25637.1&#038;rft.au=Macdonald%2C+F.&#038;rft.au=Cohen%2C+P.&#038;rft.au=Dudas%2C+F.&#038;rft.au=Schrag%2C+D.&#038;rfe_dat=bpr3.included=1;bpr3.tags=Geosciences%2CBiogeosciences%2C+Paleontology%2C+Geochemistry\">Macdonald, F., Cohen, P., Dudas, F., &#038; Schrag, D. (2010). Early Neoproterozoic scale microfossils in the Lower Tindir Group of Alaska and the Yukon Territory <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Geology, 38<\/span> (2), 143-146 DOI: <a rev=\"review\" href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1130\/G25637.1\">10.1130\/G25637.1<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/Neoprotfoss_timescale.png\" width=\"500\" height=\"129\" alt=\"Neoprotfoss_timescale.png\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Whilst the the dawn of the Cambrian clearly marked the diversification of mobile, active animals and biomineralisers, the story of their first origins appear to have begun much earlier.<br \/>\n <a href=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/2010\/02\/neoproterozoic-signs-of-life\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30,4,11,28,29],"tags":[194],"class_list":["post-3590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fossils","category-geology","category-paper-reviews","category-past-worlds","category-proterozoic","tag-ediacara-neoproterozoic-trace-fossils-microfossils"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3590"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3590\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4113,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3590\/revisions\/4113"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}