\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n<\/UL><\/p>\n
The fact that it would have been pretty expensive – and time consuming – to fill up a booth this side was no real comfort when I saw some of my compatriots across the aisle doing just that. At this stage, I was starting to wonder if the next two hours were going to consist of me looking hopefully at people as they peered in, crinkled their brow in confusion – first as they tried to locate my poster in all that blank space, and then as they read the title – and moved on. Spot the odd one out, and meet me below the fold: Tilt-Depth Method: A Simple Depth Estimation Method using First Order Magnetic Derivatives. The Use of Multi-Level Potential Field Data in Regional, Geophysical Modelling Satellite Gravity and Geoid Studies Reveal … Continue reading
\nThese were the posters in the “Advances in Gravity and Magnetics” session at AAPG on Wednesday afternoon. I don’t think that it’s too hard to spot that in comparison to the others, the last one – mine – is a little… esoteric. The “Magnetics” in the session title really refers to methods for turning maps like this<\/a> into a picture of subsurface structure, rather than reconstructing tectonic histories.
\nThis wasn’t the original plan when I signed up for this conference. Back in January, my supervisor here was invited to give a talk about the 3 billion year-old sequence that I’ve been studying at the session that I attended on Monday afternoon<\/a>. He devolved the invitation to me, so I submitted an abstract, which was accepted. I thought this meant that I was giving a talk at the aforementioned session, so you can imagine my confusion a couple of months ago when I checked out my abstract on the AAPG website, and discovered I’d been shunted to a poster session instead. I feared that my work might be a hard sell to the people wandering past, as they were unlikely to have a professional interest in the vagaries of Archean tectonics (quite understandably<\/em>, before someone takes that the wrong way).
\nTo add to my concerns, I was faced with a little dilemma when I set up my poster: the booth they provided for it was huge<\/em>. My ‘little’ A0 poster suddenly seemed quite insignificant.<\/p>\n![\"posterbooth.JPG\"](\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/posterbooth.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\nFortunately, it wasn’t quite that bad – I’m not going to claim I was mobbed with interested parties, but a reasonable number of people were willing to chat with me for a few minutes. For the most part, these discussions were in the same vein as my talk at the University of Cape Town last Friday, being more like paleomagnetic outreach than a detailed discussion of my data (I wish that I’d thought to fill some of the empty space with a ‘paleomagnetism for beginners’ sub-panel), but it was a much better experience than I feared. In fact, if I think about it, I probably talked to more people that when I presented a poster at AGU a few years ago, although that might have had something to do with most of that<\/em> session arguing with a Kiwi geologist who was not so keen on the tectonic implications of my PhD research. Perhaps there is something to be said for your audience being limited to interested non-experts…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"