{"id":3262,"date":"2008-01-22T08:32:24","date_gmt":"2008-01-22T08:32:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/2008\/01\/nature-geoscience-cutting-edge-or-consolation-prize\/"},"modified":"2008-01-22T08:32:24","modified_gmt":"2008-01-22T08:32:24","slug":"nature-geoscience-cutting-edge-or-consolation-prize","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/2008\/01\/nature-geoscience-cutting-edge-or-consolation-prize\/","title":{"rendered":"Nature Geoscience: cutting edge or consolation prize?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This month saw the launch of the first issue of <i>Nature<\/i>&#8216;s latest specialist offshoot, <a href=http:\/\/www.nature.com\/ngeo\/index.html><\/i>Nature Geoscience<\/i><\/a>. This is a monthly publication presumably designed to act as a clearing house for those contributions which don&#8217;t quite have the pizzazz to make it into the flagship.<br \/>\nMany scientists regard &#8216;Getting a <i>Nature<\/i> (or <i>Science<\/i>) publication&#8217; as somewhat akin to finding the Holy Grail &#8211; or at least, their impact-factor obsessed departmental administrators do. As such, they are willing to put up with the quirks of the whole process &#8211; the whims of the Nature editors as to whether your opus is &#8220;sexy&#8221; enough to send out for review in the first place, the eye-wateringly tight word limit, which results in jargon-heavy prose with the clarity of Limpopo River water even for someone quite well versed in the discipline (with an additional trend nowadays for &#8216;Supplementary Information&#8217; which would be more accurately described as &#8216;Quite Essential Information, Actually, Which Our Paper Does Not Stack Up Without&#8217;).<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s certainly nice to see that Geology is considered to be important enough to have it&#8217;s own little <i>Nature<\/i> subjournal, and perhaps this expansion will give geologists not working on palaeoclimate studies (yes, we do actually still exist) with a bit more of a look in. The question is, will getting published in this offshoot have a similar cachet as mother <i>Nature<\/i> itself? More importantly, will administrators and research assessments see it that way? Additionally, although two stories in the <a href=http:\/\/www.nature.com\/ngeo\/journal\/v1\/n1\/index.html>first issue<\/a> have got some coverage (see <a href=http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/sci\/tech\/7148137.stm>here<\/a> and <a href= http:\/\/www.physorg.com\/news119625364.html>here<\/a>, as well as two currently only available online (see <a href=http:\/\/www.physorg.com\/news119456760.html>here<\/a> and <a href=http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/sci\/tech\/7194579.stm>here<\/a>), it remains to be seen whether the media will pay much attention to stuff published in this particular journal.<br \/>\nWhat do people reckon? I&#8217;d also be interested to hear what people from fields with more established <i>Nature<\/i> offshoots (there&#8217;s a Physics one, a Genetics one and a Neuroscience one, amongst others) think of their impact and effectiveness.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This month saw the launch of the first issue of Nature&#8216;s latest specialist offshoot, Nature Geoscience. This is a monthly publication presumably designed to act as a clearing house for those contributions which don&#8217;t quite have the pizzazz to make &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/2008\/01\/nature-geoscience-cutting-edge-or-consolation-prize\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,4,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academic-life","category-geology","category-publication"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3262"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3262\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}