{"id":3232,"date":"2007-11-16T06:25:46","date_gmt":"2007-11-16T06:25:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/2007\/11\/the-rowan-sarchasmic-index\/"},"modified":"2007-11-16T06:25:46","modified_gmt":"2007-11-16T06:25:46","slug":"the-rowan-sarchasmic-index","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/2007\/11\/the-rowan-sarchasmic-index\/","title":{"rendered":"The Rowan Sarchasmic Index"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a href=http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/worldsfair\/2007\/11\/another_worlds_fair_meme_give.php>World&#8217;s Fair invites us to make a bid for scientific immortality<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8230; this meme asks that you come up with your own scientific eponym. What&#8217;s that exactly? Well, first read this <a href=http:\/\/www.scq.ubc.ca\/how-to-get-your-own-scientific-eponym-and-introducing-the-arbesman-limit\/ >excellent primer<\/a> by Samuel Arbesman, which basically provides a step by step description of how to do this effectively. Then have a go at your own blog. If all goes well, I&#8217;d like to create a page at the Science Creative Quarterly, that collects (and links to) the good ones.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/ethicsandscience\/2007\/11\/the_stemwedel_index_of_luddite.php>Janet<\/a>, <a href=http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2007\/11\/the_teammate_desirability_fact.php >Chad<\/a>, <a href=http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/sciencewoman\/2007\/11\/my_eponym.php >ScienceWoman<\/a> and <a href=http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/omnibrain\/2007\/11\/the_higginslevinthal_dictum_or.php>Steve<\/a>  have already taken up the challenge. Appropriately enough, I&#8217;ve just been reminded that my tendency to be ever-so-slightly sarcastic can be lost on some people, so it&#8217;s clear that the world is crying out for a way of quantifying the &#8220;sarchasm&#8221; &#8211; the perceptive gap that makes the person you&#8217;re talking to take even patently ridiculous statements seriously. Hence <b>Rowan&#8217;s Sarchasmic Index<\/b>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Sarchasm1.png\" src=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/Sarchasm1.png\" width=\"300\" height=\"174\" \/><\/p>\n<p>A small or negative &#038;DeltaS means that you are on the same wavelength, and witty repartee can ensue; a large &#038;Delta&#038;S means that there is a substantial risk that the person you are talking to will insist on thinking that you actually mean everything you say, with all the blank stares and possible drink-throwing that might imply.<br \/>\nThe ironic susceptibility &#8211; a person&#8217;s ability to pick up on sarcasm &#8211; can be shown to rely on a number of factors:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Sarchasm2.png\" src=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/Sarchasm2.png\" width=\"380\" height=\"145\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Obviously, if someone knows you well they are more likely to understand where you&#8217;re coming from. Britain is the home of deadpan humour and irony, so time spent there will give you a better familiarity with the conventions of the genre. Most importantly, interactions with creationists, woo-meisters and denialists of all stripes, who are in the habit of making utterly ridiculous statements which they <em>do<\/em> actually mean, causes serious damage to irony meters, which then need to be recalibrated by a period of exposure to rational people.<br \/>\nClearly, then, my social ineptitude is their fault.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The World&#8217;s Fair invites us to make a bid for scientific immortality: &#8230; this meme asks that you come up with your own scientific eponym. What&#8217;s that exactly? Well, first read this excellent primer by Samuel Arbesman, which basically provides &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/2007\/11\/the-rowan-sarchasmic-index\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3232","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloggery"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3232","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3232"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3232\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3232"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3232"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/all-geo.org\/highlyallochthonous\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3232"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}