Now that’s what I call a geomagnetic storm!

A post by Chris RowanIt appears that I was a litte premature with yesterday’s post. Look at what happened to the ambient magnetic field at the two observatories at Boulder and Deadhorse today (the dotted line represents about where the plots I put up yesterday ended):

Magnetic field strength variations at Boulder, CO, 1-9th March

Data from the USGS

Magnetic field strength at Deadhorse, AK, 1st-9th March

Data from USGS

This latest fluctuation is especially prominent in the data from Boulder, although this is because the background variability is so much smaller here – the actual change in the field (150-200 nT) is actually smaller than the change observed at Deadhorse (approximately 1000 nT). Nonetheless, the fact that this fluctuation is so prominent so far from the pole shows that the magnetosphere is getting a bit of a battering.

So what’s changed? According to NASA:

As of March 8, the storm was fairly mild since the magnetic fields from the CMEs were partially aligned with Earth’s own and thus slid around the magnetosphere. However, the geomagnetic storm has increased because the magnetic fields of the CMEs have now changed direction such that they can more easily deposit magnetic energy and radiation into Earth’s environment.

So it seems the magnetic field of the coronal mass ejection was originally aligned so that the Earth’s magnetic field mostly pushed it away, in the same way that the north (or south) poles of two bar magnets repel each other if you try to put them together. But now the field has changed its alignment, making it more like what happens when you put the opposite poles of two bar magnets close to each other: they don’t take much encouragement to bang together. Still, it seems that the real-world effects are limited for now – unless you’re a field geophysicist planning to do some magnetic surveying. Rapid changes in the background field like this will drown out any changes due to changes in the subsurface, so they’ll be a few days of waiting for things to die down before any useful measurements can be made.

Categories: geohazards, geophysics, palaeomagic, planets

The Earth weathers another geomagnetic storm

A post by Chris RowanA couple of days ago, the sun got a bit excitable:

This large flare produced what is known as a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME), a blob of gas and radiation hurled at high velocities from the surface of the sun out into space, and which forecasts last night suggested was heading our way. This was potentially worrying, because when material from a CME impacts with the Earth’s magnetosphere it can cause a geomagnetic storm – powerful fluctuations in the local magnetic field that can not only damage orbiting satellites, but potentially induce crippling voltage fluctuations in our power grids.

The CME was forecast to pass through our planetary neighbourhood early this morning, so I was happy to wake to working electricity and internet. Still, I was curious about what effect the CME was having on the Earth’s magnetosphere, so I looked up some measurements from a couple of the USGS’s magnetic observatories. The figure below shows how the magnetic field strength in Deadhorse, Alaska – within the Arctic Circle – has varied since the beginning of March.

Geomagnetic field strength measured in Deadhorse, Alaska, in the first week of March. Data from the USGS.

Most of the magnetic field measured in Deadhorse or anywhere else on the Earth’s surface is being generated by convection in the Earth’s outer core. But this internal field will not vary too much over periods of days and weeks, so the fluctuations that we’re seeing on this plot must have an external cause. Mostly, they’re due to interactions of the magnetosphere – the part of the Earth’s magnetic field that extends beyond the atmosphere – with the solar wind. Bigger fluctuations correspond to a stronger, more energetic solar wind. The field before the 6th March appears has its fair share of jerks and fluctuations; Deadhorse is at a high latitude close to the north magnetic pole, where field lines run straight down from the magnetosphere into the inner core, so the solar wind has an especially strong influence here. However, there are two especially large jumps in the field on Wednesday and Thursday, marked roughly by the dotted vertical lines, which might be to the CME.

I also looked at data from the geomagnetic observatory in Boulder, Colorado.

Geomagnetic field strength measured in Boulder, Colorado, in the first week of March. Data from the USGS

We’re further from the pole, so the overall field in Boulder is a bit weaker. The external contribution to the ambient magnetic field still varies over the whole period I downloaded data for, but these fluctuations are both smaller than those observed at Deadhorse (20 or 30 nanoTeslas as opposed to more than 500 nT) and also more regular; there’s a definite day-night cycle caused by the the Earth’s rotation. This regular cycle is clearly interrupted on the 7th and 8th (yesterday and today), and the dotted lines show that these fluctuations at Boulder occurred at pretty much the same time as the largest jerks at Deadhorse do. This synchronous timing, seen in two places thousands of miles apart, tells us that this is a large-scale fluctuation of the magnetosphere, caused by it interacting with a large packet of unusually energetic solar wind.

So this latest CME did not pass our orbit completely quietly, even if it didn’t melt our power lines as it sped past. We can breathe a sigh of relief, and use our still functioning internets to go ‘ooh’ at the supercharged aurora.

Categories: geophysics, palaeomagic, planets

Scenic Saturday: a special place

A post by Chris RowanA purely scenic one this week, but this is a place that is very special to both Anne and myself.

Buzzard Rock

Buzzard Rock, Latta Plantation, North Carolina. Photo: Chris Rowan 2012.

It’s not surprising that we can both find things to appreciate about this overlook: after all, as the cliche goes, I like rocks and Anne likes water. But here, as is often the case – as is the case on this blog, in fact – it is the combination of the two that has the most pleasing results.

Categories: photos

New at Erratics: the challenges of teaching geology in high school

Our newest Earth Science Erratics blogger, Erin Parker, is a teacher at an urban public high school in Wisconsin, who every semester is presented with the task of teaching “150 boisterous students” about earth science. In her first post, she describes an exercise aimed at teaching them about the sequence and tempo of geological history:

Today, I’ve handed out props with rough dates attached, and asked the class to physically arrange themselves in order of appearance in the fossil record- a stuffed black plague microbe stands in for the first life-forms; a plastic Buzz Lightyear represents modern humans…

Head over to find out how they do, and read Erin’s thoughts on the particular challenges of making geology interesting and relevant to students who may only be taking it as a science credit of last resort; something that is going to be a major theme of her posting.

I don’t know the answers, but I am certainly trying to make geology and oceanography come alive for my kids. My contributions to Earth Science Erratics will focus on my challenges and successes connecting students to earth science, and my own occasional sojourns into the realm of field geology.

School is where the vast majority of people get most of all the science education we’re ever going to get, but with the occasional awesome exception, blogging about teaching at this level is far less common than blogging about teaching at Universities. So we’re delighted to welcome Erin to Erratics, and the geoblogosphere, where we can all hear about, and learn from, her experiences. Please go and say hello!

Categories: links, teaching

Stuff we linked to on Twitter last week

A post by Chris RowanA post by Anne Jefferson

Volcanoes

Earthquakes

Fossils

Planets

Water

Environmental

General Geology

Interesting Miscellaney

Categories: links

Scenic Sunday: a hike across Hawaiian lava

A post by Chris RowanFortunately, the schedule for my recent trip to the Big Island of Hawaii included a couple of days of field excursions – I think the conference organisers realised that they would happen regardless, so they decided to make them official so people actually turned up for presentations. On one of these excursions, we visited the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory and the Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, both of which are centred around Kilauea, the youngest and most active of the volcanoes that make up the Big Island. Eruptions on Kilauea are not confined to the summit caldera but also regularly occur along a rift zone that runs roughly east from the summit down to the coast. The combination of lots of lava reaching the surface, and that lava coming out in lots of different places, produces a landscape that is not only extremely young, but also constantly changing. Our hike through the park really brought this home, right from the time we parked at the trailhead; immediately after climbing off the bus, I found myself looking down a road that abruptly ended in a lava field.

This road through the National Park lasted less than a decade before the Kilauea went all NIMBY on it. Photo: Chris Rowan, 2012.

A road built to view volcanoes that is now part of one was only one of the dramatic recent changes in this area. Our walk took us across a lava field to the summit of Pu’u Huluhulu, the forested hill on the left in the picture below. This cinder cone formed around 500 years ago; and up until around 50 years ago, it was the highest point in the immediate area. A viewpoint at the top gave people a lovely view of surrounding volcanic craters, and an unimpeded look down to the coast. But all that changed between 1969 and 1974 when a major fissure eruption culminated in the the view from Pu’u Huluhulu being cut off by the formation of Mauna Ulu, the shield volcano on the right.

Pu'u Huluhulu, on the left, is an "old" hill now surrounded by new lava from Mauna Ulu on the right. Photo: Chris Rowan, 2012.

Mauna Ulu from the summit of Pu'u Huluhulu. Note the perched lava lake about half way down. Photo: Chris Rowan, 2012.

The trail crossed a complex landscape of overlapping flows, including fine examples of pahoehoe and a’a lava flows. No prizes for guessing which type of lava the trail stuck to.

A'a on top of pahoehoe; it's all basalt, but with entirely different textures and structures. Photo: Chris Rowan, 2012.

A close up of a ropey pahoehoe lava flow lobe, or 'toe'. The trail actually moves up along it! Photo: Chris Rowan, 2012.

A lava flow that has been broken up by deflation, where still-molten lava at the base of the flow drains away, causing the solid crust to collapse into the space left behind. Photo: Chris Rowan, 2012.

The edge of a blocky a'a flow with its source, Mauna Ulu, in the background.

A many-toed pahoehoe lava flow that has engulfed the (former) western slope of Pu'u Huluhulu. Photo: Chris Rowan, 2012.

As we reached the flanks of Pu’u Huluhulu, you could see where the lava from Mauna Ulu had lapped up on it’s flanks. Fortunately for the trees on the summit, the eruption stopped before it engulfed the hill completely, leaving a kipuka – and island of living green in the midst of sterile lava.

Lava from Mauna Ulu lapping against the slopes of Pu'u Huluhulu. Photo: Chris Rowan, 2012.

Of course, the lavas from Mauna Ulu were moving across areas just as forested as Pu’u Huluhulu still is, and the spectacular results of the one-sided contest between molten rock and wood are seen at some points along the trail: these ‘lava trees’ were formed when they were overwhelmed by lava and then exposed as the flow deflated. All that now remains of the original tree is the mould-like imprint of the bark on the inside hollow lava tubes.

A Hawaiian lava tree. Photo: Chris Rowan, 2012.

An imprint of the original tree bark is clearly visible inside this lava tube. Photo: Chris Rowan, 2012.

This hike really brought home what a dynamic place Hawaii is: it’s a place where new scenery is being continuously created, where old landscapes are constantly being buried to make way for new. And if you’re more a fan of slower-paced geology, and so feel overwhelmed by all this dynamism: at the end of the day you can just kick back with a Mai Tai, and enjoy the sunset.

Sunset from Kona coast, Hawaii. Photo: Chris Rowan, 2012.

Categories: outcrops, photos, volcanoes

The soundtrack of our unquiet Earth

A post by Chris RowanI’ve coming down off an intense few weeks’ of travelling: first to this years’ ScienceOnline conference (some thoughts about which might appear here soon), then to a conference on Hawaii’s Big Island (which I’ll definitely be writing about), and then a brief detour into Ohio. I almost feel like I’ve seen more of O’Hare airport in the last month than I have of my flat, which as anyone who has spent time in O’Hare will tell you, is not a good thing.

Anyway, as I warm up my blogging muscles, I thought I’d quickly share an excellent video brought to my attention on Twitter by fellow All-geo blogger John Stevenson, which rather cleverly visually – and aurally – sums up global earthquake activity in 2011. Given the nature of seismic waves, I think that adding sound is a really nice touch; you might, like me, think there’s a possessed typewriter somewhere in your home, but it really brings home that earthquakes really do happen all the time, even if only the really big and/or unfortunately located ones make the news.

Speaking of really big earthquakes, just wait until the Tohuku earthquake hits at 1:50. It’s hard to miss, and the energy released – and the aftershocks thus triggered – by this magnitude 9.0 event clearly alters the pace and rhythm of the Earth’s tectonic song for all the months that follow.

Categories: earthquakes

Where on Google Earth #329 – Now with 100% fewer coordinates*

A post by Anne JeffersonThe last Where on Google Earth challenge sat for two weeks unfound, before a pair of hints led me to the classic Troodos ophiolite region. Thus, I get to tickle your brains with the next installment of this geopuzzle. I suspect this one will go pretty quickly.

Image captured from Google Earth, February 2012

Where on Google Earth #329. Now with 100% fewer coordinates. Click image to enlarge.

For those that haven’t played before, here’s a quick overview of the rules. First one to correctly identify the latitude and longitude of the center of the image AND say something about what makes this area geologically interesting…wins. The prize is getting to pick the next WoGE location and hosting it on your blog or picking a geoblogger to host it for you. If you’ve won WoGE in the past, you have to wait one hour before submitting your answer for each of your previous wins (the Schott Rule). If you don’t remember how many times you’ve won, you can look at Ron Schott’s kmz file.

Posting time is 18:20 Eastern US time (23:20 GMT) on Sunday, 5 February 2012. Happy hunting.

*Sorry for the earlier SNAFU. I was defeated by WordPress’s gallery feature that allowed some of you to see the coordinates even after I thought I’d fixed my error. “100% fewer coordinates” borrowed from Maria Brumm who committed a similar error years ago.

Categories: geopuzzling

Scenic Saturday: The pretty side of stream restoration

A post by Anne JeffersonSome days, working in restored urban streams is quite enjoyable. The picture below is one of our field sites for a multi-year study of the downstream effects of stormwater management. This is Edwards Branch, and it is one of the jewels of Charlotte’s intensive efforts to restore its urban waterways.

Edwards Branch stream restoration

Two tributaries come together in a restored reach of Edwards Branch, September 2011

This reach was restored in 2002, with additional work done in 2005 and 2008. Among the features of this project was the creation of a large stormwater wetland, which lies between the two branches of the stream and is just out of sight in the picture above. The stream channel was also restored using a variety of standard techniques including bioengineering, rock steps, bank regrading, and riparian planting. You can see some of those practices at work if you look closely at the picture below.

Edwards Branch, looking downstream.

Edwards Branch, looking downstream. How many restoration features can you spot?

Edwards Branch certainly shows the signs of human activities, but amidst the dense foliage, with the clear baseflow, it would be easy to think of stream restoration as a cure-all for the woes of urban streams. That it most certainly is not. And sometimes it’s not so pretty, but that’s a post for another day. For now, enjoy today’s Scenic Saturday.

Categories: by Anne, environment, fieldwork, geomorphology, photos

How I (mostly) slept through the one of the largest earthquakes to hit NW Europe in 200 years

A post by Chris RowanIn the early hours of 13 April 1992, the border region in western Europe where Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands meet was shaken by a magnitude 5.4 earthquake, caused by northeast-southwest extension in the Roer Valley Graben. The shaking was severe enough to damage buildings 30-40 kilometres from the epicentre. 40 kilometres to the south, in the small town of Valkenburg, a group of British schoolchildren on a European excursion were sleeping peacefully in their beds, a 13 year-young version of this geoblogger amongst their number.

Location of the Roermond earthquake on 13th April 1992; location of Chris on 13th April 1992. Source for map: Geluk et al. 1994 (click for pdf).

I distinctly remember waking up to the room shaking and (rather woozily) thinking, “Earthquake!” But I also distinctly remember then thinking, “You don’t get earthquakes in the Netherlands. I must be dreaming,” before turning over and going back to sleep. Imagine my surprise the next morning when I discovered that not only had everyone else in our hotel shared my “dream”, but that the shaking had been strong enough to toss some of them from their beds. And that is how I semi-slept through what remains my only up close and personal encounter with the tectonic forces that shape our planet: forces that I would end up studying for a living, little did I know it at the time.

I normally tell this story for humourous effect, but a part of me always cringes a little inside when I recall these events, because it also illustrates how, despite me already having ambitions to become a scientist at this age, I was still a long way from thinking like a scientist. Firstly, I assumed in the arrogance of precocious youth that I already knew everything worth knowing about earthquakes. I had read that earthquakes were associated with the boundaries of tectonic plates, and I also knew that the Netherlands was nowhere near such a boundary. I had read nothing, or at least remembered nothing, about the earthquakes that occur within plates, but I wasn’t yet mature enough to realise how much I didn’t know.

Perhaps 'Mount Unknowingly Ignorant' would be more accurate. Source: Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal (click for full comic).

Perhaps more seriously, when confronted with a contradiction between what I thought I knew and actual reality, I responded with reflexive denial rather than curiousity. Even if it was 100% established that earthquakes only ever occurred at plate boundaries, a true scientist would not respond to an apparent earthquake in the Netherlands with a cry of “that’s impossible!’ A true scientist would think “hmmm, that’s funny…” and start investigating.

Narrative causality would demand that I close this story by telling you that not only did realising my mistake the next morning set me on the path to developing a proper scientific mindset, but also that it inspired me to take an interest in geology and tectonics. Sadly, neither is true. It took a few much more painful lessons before I became properly humble about my knowledge of the world; and before I learnt to stop bending the world to fit my preconceived notions, and actually observe and think more carefully about what was going on around me. And although I can’t completely rule out some subconcious effect of the Roermond earthquake on my later career choices, it took me at least six more years before I truly discovered the wonders of geology.

Now I know better than to dismiss the earthquake potential of places like central Europe. The Netherlands might be a long way from a true plate boundary, but there is a historical earthquake record going back centuries in this region, and paleoseismic studies following the 1992 earthquake found several fault scarps in the area with signs of Quarternary displacement. The Atlantic coast of the US has recently been described as a ‘passive-aggressive’ margin, hosting faults that can build up significant elastic strain over centuries and millenia before rupturing in earthquakes that could reach magnitude 7. Likewise, its European counterpart is not without its seismic dangers.

Corrective note: This post title originally referred to me sleeping through the ‘largest European earthquake in 200 years’. I think I originally meant to write ‘one of the largest’, but even then that’s a bit of an over-reach if you’re including Italy and Greece’. The title has now been appropriately modified.

This post was written in response to Ron Schott’s Accretionary Wedge call for stories of the most memorable or significant geologic event that we’ve directly experienced. Even if I sort of slept through it, I should at least get partial credit, right?

Categories: academic life, earthquakes