<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gulf of Mexico spill is bad enough without turning it into a disaster movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2010/07/the-gulf-of-mexico-spill-is-bad-enough-without-turning-it-into-a-disaster-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2010/07/the-gulf-of-mexico-spill-is-bad-enough-without-turning-it-into-a-disaster-movie/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-gulf-of-mexico-spill-is-bad-enough-without-turning-it-into-a-disaster-movie</link>
	<description>NEWS &#38; COMMENTARY FROM THE WORLD OF GEOLOGY &#38; EARTH SCIENCE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:06:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoblogospheric community: what is it good for? &#171; Watershed Hydrogeology Blog</title>
		<link>http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2010/07/the-gulf-of-mexico-spill-is-bad-enough-without-turning-it-into-a-disaster-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-11499</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoblogospheric community: what is it good for? &#171; Watershed Hydrogeology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/?p=3753#comment-11499</guid>
		<description>[...] When the next challenge comes along, whether it&#8217;s in the form of ridiculous rumours about methane tsunamis, lack of reporting on an unfolding natural disaster, or construing volcano monitoring as political [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When the next challenge comes along, whether it&#8217;s in the form of ridiculous rumours about methane tsunamis, lack of reporting on an unfolding natural disaster, or construing volcano monitoring as political [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoblogospheric community. What is it good for? &#124; Highly Allochthonous</title>
		<link>http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2010/07/the-gulf-of-mexico-spill-is-bad-enough-without-turning-it-into-a-disaster-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-11343</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoblogospheric community. What is it good for? &#124; Highly Allochthonous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/?p=3753#comment-11343</guid>
		<description>[...] When the next challenge comes along, whether it&#8217;s in the form of ridiculous rumours about methane tsunamis, lack of reporting on an unfolding natural disaster, or construing volcano monitoring as political [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When the next challenge comes along, whether it&#8217;s in the form of ridiculous rumours about methane tsunamis, lack of reporting on an unfolding natural disaster, or construing volcano monitoring as political [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rowan</title>
		<link>http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2010/07/the-gulf-of-mexico-spill-is-bad-enough-without-turning-it-into-a-disaster-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-11273</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/?p=3753#comment-11273</guid>
		<description>No, there is not always a chance. Especially when people start with a mistaken premise and then make stuff up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, there is not always a chance. Especially when people start with a mistaken premise and then make stuff up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eliza</title>
		<link>http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2010/07/the-gulf-of-mexico-spill-is-bad-enough-without-turning-it-into-a-disaster-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-11272</link>
		<dc:creator>eliza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/?p=3753#comment-11272</guid>
		<description>well,  your just gunna look like a huge idiot if this does happen.
there is always a chance.
and  YOU could be the reason that millions of people die. 
is that something you really want to live with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well,  your just gunna look like a huge idiot if this does happen.<br />
there is always a chance.<br />
and  YOU could be the reason that millions of people die.<br />
is that something you really want to live with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rowan</title>
		<link>http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2010/07/the-gulf-of-mexico-spill-is-bad-enough-without-turning-it-into-a-disaster-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-11264</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/?p=3753#comment-11264</guid>
		<description>Well, your four links can&#039;t really be bundled together into a &#039;theory&#039;: they are only related in the sense that they involve methane having some sort of significant geological impact, and none of them really have any bearing on what&#039;s going on in the Gulf of Mexico. In most cases, there is the usual caveat that when geologists use &#039;rapid&#039; they are generally still talking about &lt;em&gt;at least&lt;/em&gt; a few thousand years. The only exception is the Cretaceous impact one - which I haven&#039;t heard before - but I hope I don&#039;t have to point out that one half-metre borehole is a little different from a 6 mile-across asteroid....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, your four links can&#8217;t really be bundled together into a &#8216;theory&#8217;: they are only related in the sense that they involve methane having some sort of significant geological impact, and none of them really have any bearing on what&#8217;s going on in the Gulf of Mexico. In most cases, there is the usual caveat that when geologists use &#8216;rapid&#8217; they are generally still talking about <em>at least</em> a few thousand years. The only exception is the Cretaceous impact one &#8211; which I haven&#8217;t heard before &#8211; but I hope I don&#8217;t have to point out that one half-metre borehole is a little different from a 6 mile-across asteroid&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finn</title>
		<link>http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2010/07/the-gulf-of-mexico-spill-is-bad-enough-without-turning-it-into-a-disaster-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-11262</link>
		<dc:creator>Finn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/?p=3753#comment-11262</guid>
		<description>So, do you think all methane explosion theories are bull or just this one? What about all the past theories of mass extinctions that you can read about:

http://pangea.stanford.edu/research/Oceans/GES205/methaneGeology.pdf (George Ryshkin&#039;s paper)

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astronomy/dinosaurs_fry_991118.html

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10935632

Or, the lake that exploded in Cameroon as mentioned in this cheesy history channel video: http://vimeo.com/8269021

Are you saying that the entire theory is definitely false or only in the specific context of the BP oil spill?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, do you think all methane explosion theories are bull or just this one? What about all the past theories of mass extinctions that you can read about:</p>
<p><a href="http://pangea.stanford.edu/research/Oceans/GES205/methaneGeology.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://pangea.stanford.edu/research/Oceans/GES205/methaneGeology.pdf</a> (George Ryshkin&#8217;s paper)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astronomy/dinosaurs_fry_991118.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astronomy/dinosaurs_fry_991118.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10935632" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10935632</a></p>
<p>Or, the lake that exploded in Cameroon as mentioned in this cheesy history channel video: <a href="http://vimeo.com/8269021" rel="nofollow">http://vimeo.com/8269021</a></p>
<p>Are you saying that the entire theory is definitely false or only in the specific context of the BP oil spill?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

